73 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Bragg MUST ASK Did Trump have Michael Cohen Pay Off the Other Women? Would Demonstrate Additional "Pattern and Practice"

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert Weiner
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

By Robert Weiner and Ben Kearney

With Donald Trump's hush money trial to begin on April 15th, the question that Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg must ask in the trial beginning after the April 15 Jury selection is, Did Donald Trump have Michael Cohen, his "fix-it" lawyer, also pay off the multiple (CNN reported on May 8, 2018, "at least fifteen") other women who made allegations against the former President? Action on these accusations is an important "pattern and practice" Bragg could use for the trial on Trump blocking negative information before November's election.

In fact, the trial should not be called a "hush-money trial" but an "election hush-money trial". Tying the word "election" to the trial gets at Trump's objective to impact the election with what were essentially bribes to the women to shut up so people would not vote against Trump. That additional connection and legal violation is what gave Bragg the basis to charge felonies.

Rudy Giuliani, attorney and friend of Trump, once responded to a question by George Stephanopoulos in a 2018 interview about whether Cohen paid off these other women with: "I have no knowledge of that, but I would think if it was necessary, yes. He [Cohen] made payments for the President or he's conducted business for the President, which means he had legal fees, monies laid out and expenditures." Giuliani also said that the agreement with Cohen, was "a longstanding agreement" that Cohen takes care of situations like the one with Daniels, "then gets paid for them sometimes".

What Cohen may say to Bragg during the trial is "I can't comment on that, it's a lawyer-client relationship", which quite likely could mean it's true. Or, he can say, "Yes, I paid them all." The prosecution has a right to ask.

It's not just lies about adult film star Stormy Daniels, who was paid $130,000 by Cohen in 2016; it also includes "Playmate of the Year" Carroll McDougall, already in the Bragg case but the fame of Daniels is all the media keeps reporting. Bragg points out that McDougall was allegedly paid $150,000 the same year.

But there is also Rachel Crooks, the former Bayrock Group receptionist who accused Trump of kissing her on the mouth without her consent back in 2006. Karena Virginia and Amy Dorris, two women whom Trump groped at the U.S Open in the late 1990s. How about Jessica Leeds, who accused Trump of grabbing her chest and attempting to move his hand up her skirt like an octopus on a flight over thirty years ago?

The accusations aren't out of the blue; many of these women spoke out for sexual abuse by Trump. Jessica Drake, a former adult film star like Daniels, accused Trump of kissing, grabbing, and offering her $10,000 to come to his penthouse hotel room in 2006. Mindy McGillivray said back in 2017 that Trump groped at Mar-a-Lago during a Ray Charles concert in 2003. Natasha Stoynoff, a former People Magazine writer, said Trump assaulted her in December 2005 while she was at Mar-a-Lago to interview him and a then-pregnant Melania Trump for a story. Why aren't these women, who announced their accusations seven or eight years ago, in the public eye ahead of the trial? Probably because they were paid off by Cohen for their silence as he was instructed to do by Trump.

Let's not forget that Michael Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 for admitting he violated federal campaign finance laws with the payment to Daniels, which exceeded contribution limits, and lying before Congress. Cohen is seen as a key witness against Trump, with a February 2024 Reuters article stating "Prosecutors say his [Cohen's] payment to Daniels was part of a broader 'catch-and-kill' scheme to prevent allegations that Trump had extramarital affairs from coming to light ahead of the 2016 election."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Weiner Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ISSUES STRATEGIST Bob Weiner, a national issues and public affairs strategist, has been spokesman for and directed the public affairs offices of White House Drug Czar and Four Star General Barry (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Vote Against Their Own Interest?

Jeb Bush's Elephant in the Room: Role in Bush v. Gore Recount

Mueller's End Game: Maybe As Soon As Trump Wants, But Not How He'd Like

Food Stamp Myth Busting

Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Peaceful Energy?

Bad money vs. bad money -- how Denver ballot measure could be blueprint for getting money out of politics

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend