I don't recall getting to vote on sending more weapons to four wars at a time in the name of democracy, do you?
Has anybody asked you whether you agree with the media's universal consensus that having a House Speaker who could facilitate the prolongation, escalation, and creation of numerous wars would be obviously better than not having a House Speaker?
Has a single member of the House even agreed to shut up and stop speaking during what should be a blissful period of silent speakerlessness?
Since summer, the U.S. public has been willing to say No to pollsters on sending weapons to wars, if asked incisively enough. A CNN poll in August broke with the standard of calling a mountain of weapons accompanied by a couple of trucks of bread "aid" and gave people lots of options for what the U.S. could do in Ukraine: "Assistance in intelligence gathering, "Military training," "Weapons," "U.S. military forces to participate in combat operations," "Another form of assistance." Only the first two broke 50%. The last two didn't break 25% support.
According to CBS on October 19, strong majorities want to send humanitarian aid to Israel and Palestine but only 48% in the U.S. want to send weapons to Israel. And 53% of Democrats oppose sending "weapons/supplies" to Israel. And according to Data for Progress, 66% agree with this: "The U.S. should call for a ceasefire and a de-escalation of violence in Gaza. The U.S. should leverage its close diplomatic relationship with Israel to prevent further violence and civilian deaths." Whether its close diplomatic relationship encompasses its role as chief weapons dealer, we can perhaps not be absolutely sure, given that most people do not know most things, potentially including where Israel gets its weapons. But seriously attempting to "prevent further violence" does require halting weapons shipments.
Of course, all answers are available in polling on any question depending on how one words the question. According to the USA Today on October 24, you can get 58% to support sending the vague substance called "aid" if you call Hamas "terrorists" and use other questions to pretend the only two options ever available are warmaking and isolationism.
The usually horrible Quinnipiac claims that 64% say yes to "Do you approve or disapprove of the United States sending weapons and military equipment to Israel in response to the Hamas terrorist attack?" But it claims only 39% of 18- to 34-year-olds say yes to that. And one can hardly expect old people to be skeptical enough to understand that in reality there is more than one way to respond to a war/terrorist attack.
What if there were a way to hear from people more in-depth? Well, here's a petition, signed by thousands, that says to the U.S. government "No More Weapons Shipments to Ukraine, Israel, or Taiwan. Stop the weapons shipments, and replace them with diplomacy and a new focus on the human and environmental crises that these wars defund, distract from, and exacerbate." People have added comments to the petition, including these:
"Absolutely, no more weapons shipments, including airplanes, to Israel. Why would anyone add fuel to this horrific, fiery war? We are not going to end this carnage until we stop the flow of weapons and start dialogue between the powers that be."
"It's time to demand an immediate ceasefire to all fighting on both sides of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. There's no good outcome from arming anyone anywhere anymore! Eastern Ukraine is a great example of our violent policies while more and more people in this country slide into poverty. Enough is enough!"
"Stop sending money to Israel every year!"
"The more weapons we give to Israel the longer Israel will maintain it's brutal and illegal occupation. Israel violates International Law and the U.S. is an accessory to their crimes. We need Peace, not War."
"Clearly this President loves the idea of war and keeping the American 'merchants of death' rich and fat. As a nation we need to be looking at negotiating for the end of wars, not to be feeding the flames of war."
"There is no better time for peace than right now."
"We must stand up for the suffering people of Gaza! We are supporting genocide."
"Please wise up and recognize that this Earth and the life it sustains is the most important thing. Stop fomenting war and relinquish your love of power and your worship of Death."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
