Did they "kill" the long-dead Bin Laden to set up a terrifying "revenge attack" to be blamed on Iran?

Asked why they killed the long dead bogeyman Bin Laden, so long effectively used to scare Americans into sufficiently support some very profitable military campaigns (and to take away our freedoms), I gave the following answer:

I think they have gotten all the mileage they can out of the old Bin Laden. While I would like to think the Obama administration was laying the groundwork for getting our military out of Afghanistan and Iraq and declaring an end to the so-called "war on terror", my concern is that a powerful few that calls the shots in Washington might instead be laying the groundwork for orchestrating, in the NAME of revenge for the killing of Bin Laden, another terrifying violent attack, likely bigger than 9-11. Among the things they could do with this is blame Iran.

Iran has long been in the sights of those who largely run our country. It is has the last large oil reserves not controlled by the multinational oil companies and possibly the largest banking system, outside of China, not controlled by the international banking cartel. The three top powerful groups, that I would argue dominate our government, the military contractors, the bankers and the multinational oil company heads would be very happy with a destruction of the Iranian government and a military campaign or possibly nuclear bombing there. The powers that control Israel, that I would argue are often the same international power brokers that dominate our government, would also be very happy with a destruction of the independent government of Iran.

A possible greatest ever scaring of the American public and the destruction of the Iranian government could be a final stage in consolidating the power of the globalist totalitarians to create one global totalitarian state.