Paris Commune is a communal direction practice at Paris where has been threaten by Prussia. It begins with the belching blockade of Prussia and been overthrow the French government by communists. That the employers own factories which have been left by owners before, direction of National Commute; hunger, famine and sordidness people being government and resisting to Versailles armies are dynamic of Paris Commune. Paris Commune is a practice of revolution by the employers who comprising after Industry Revolution. They have been successfully at first step of revolution but later steps stumble. The processions what advised to all next politics of Marxist have been turns cinematic rhetoric by Peter Watkins. It is a documentary for 6 hours. (Commune (Paris-1871)
Commune (Paris-1871) is an original work; it is different with other books, articles, documentaries, films etc. on same subject. Film includes all events and notions of a short utopia; dynamic discussions are done with static notions for example struggle of employers, capitalism, anarchism and manufacturing. Film does these as climbing over the time of standard and industrial films; as bringing the behind the camera visuals to in front of camera; as turns to studio a factory which has been left (It is like employers capture the factories in Paris); as composing a team with amateur players. Film demands communal additive of watchers: watch this film during six hours carefully and think on. That players to telling in front of camera about additives of film, players to discussing Paris Commune term and today's conditions together, these discussions appears conditions of manufacturing and exploitation goes on today, asking to players if they do for role at real life or do not and their sincerity answers demonstrate the specialties of Commune (Paris 1871). These specialties are original as wont been related with other standard even some radical films, too.
Film doesn't apply to ready knowledge about struggle of employers. It takes note of discussions, comments, alternatives, critics and suggestions instead of ready knowledge. Film is full researching-laboratory working.
Film processes the watchers to reading didactic and intellectual texts. So film is not only entertainment. It processes watchers to thinking; we are witness to a serious experiment. If knowledge has been told by a speaker or navigator, it would be bad. Because additive and striving of watcher would have been taken to out. But film has some amusing actions, too.
France is a state of revolutions. The French get realized 5 republic revolution at history. While history waits Russian employers waking up for Revolution of October, the French get realized communal revolution, before Russians. French employers respond to the national consensus what waking up with Revolution of France (1876), about 100 years later. French socialism is different with at east Europe where has been effected by Soviet Russia. French socialism is more original than east Europe states because of Paris Commune experiment. (French socialism hasn't power after Fransuva Mitterand dies. But Soviets collapse at same time, too)
Is Paris Commune a debacle? Paris Commune is an important experiment what thousand people deadly get realize, despite all critics and accusations. But it couldn't spread to France rather other France revolutions. Employers target not only government but also a part of The Frances (Capitalists). Karl Marks identities the Paris Commune as the France domestic war. Problem of leader, inexpertness, inexperience, emotional mistakes and purities cause to shilling.
If how Sergei Eisenstein applies to action in " Bronyenosyets Potyomkin', Peter Watkins applies to dialogues at Commune (Paris 1871). Because, Eisenstein aims to propaganda, but Watkins aims to telling and to demonstrating the Paris Commune with events, discussions, mistakes and successions. Watkins just underlines killing pure people. They are so pure that they can't pay for revolution the moneys in the France Bank. Commune (Paris-1871) film just does propaganda the perversions of cinema and television industry. TV channels don't except broadcast and cinema companies don't except to delivering of copies. I want to write about this film a bit additive of it against to capitalist cinema and media industries.
