Can The Bush Family Wealth Be Seized Under The Trading With the Enemies Act?

Can The Bush Family Wealth Be Seized Under The Trading With the Enemies Act?

    POLL: Can All of The Bush Family Wealth Be Seized Under The Trading With the Enemies Act of 1941, RETROACTIVELY?

GW Bush is fond of destroying the law by ignoring Ex-Post Facto defenses. So, I say turn the tables on him by prosecuting Prescott Bush, post-mortem and retroactively confiscate all Bush family wealth which was owed entirely to its investment base in the hand of the Bush Cabal in the era 1932-1942-1951 wherein the Bush friends and family broke the Trading With The Enemies Act and were never prosecuted for that and the attempt on the life of FDR in 1932-1933 allegedly by Prescott Bush.

Fast-forward to 2008, 76 years later (that magic number tied to 1776) and Senator Barack Obama and John McCain’s run for the presidency. Senator Barack Obama and has begun to sound increasingly like the Bushites. There are now several theories concerning his about face, but this in the face of Iraqi’s who were once called Bushite Puppets jumping on the Get out of Iraq Bandwagon, is a bit disconcerting. One of the theories concerns Obama's giving the voters a no-difference in war philosophies and winning over the soft-core moderate Republicans. That, as the pressure mounts on Bush, as more and more Iraqis, former Bush followers, side in with the troop removal timeline. We already know for what John McCain stands, anything that will get him elected, is what he will embrace. Including sucking up to GW Bush, once and forever his mortal enemy. So, let us look closer at Senator Barack Obama and the source of the philosophies they both espouse seemingly without clue one of the origins of their ideas.

One should know that sticking to one’s guns and stated philosophies wins followers and places pressure on the opposition, but new recruits into the Obama camp are edging toward the right, and risking loosing the left and the possible converts on the left edge of the Right, and much of the Middle, right-Moderates.

Bush, for instance has been nothing but consistent for nearly eight years, (consistently, morally incorrect) except for lately, but Obama, recently has been waffling and moving to the Right. Whoever is giving him advice lately, needs to GO and fast! The mistake of the decade was listening to Pelosi/Emmanuel on Impeachment. That prissy/sissy, wusses approach is placing Obama closer to McCain. Now it needs to be understood, what the mistaken, erroneous, unintelligent, loser mentality, (which blew the 12000, 2004 elections) have raised their ugly heads for the third time.

Oh, it was not simply the alleged Donna Brazille, lack of chess knowledge, lack of demographic knowledge, lack of common sense and seeming shrinking Violet, shaky, pussycat mentality. No, instead it was that indeed, plus an amateurism, as though these three campaigns were being run by IQ deficient, adolescents, with no comprehension of the magnitude of the world at stake, here-clueless comes to mind.

Obama, a few months ago, amidst a firestorm of anger against Blackwater and other mercenary firms, appears to have been missing the news or camping in the oxygen deprived heights of Mount Everest-29,028 feet high. What in the name of all that is wise was he thinking. From where are these ideas originating?

Isn’t it a kick in the head when politicians are successful up to a point and they suddenly change directions after ”Bolstering” their Staff with losers, whose last three attempts at victory, would allow a few six-year’s olds, to outplay them. Why has he changed positions? Is it because Hillary will be his VP and he wishes also to attract her supporters who adhered to a harder line on defense? Or is it the creeping hand of unknown agents working under cover, without raising the suspicions of either candidate?

Moreover, as many nations, fall in behind the Senator’s previous positions, including Iraqi, Bushite Stalwarts, victory there for the taking, they once again, as they did in 2000 and 2004, are they once more, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory? Are some of their advisors “Plants,” whose sole job is to have them fail?

Oh, some will say, that these are the things we must have him say to win over a segment of the Bush vote. Geeps! You already have, by virtue of your previous positions, won that-the guy’s approval rating is 28%, and that is being inherited for the most part by, his opponent, whose rating is 39% and falling, that is, until lately. It has halted its downward spiral and is in a holding pattern seemingly about to rebound not on what McCain is saying, most of which is lame, but over what Obama is saying and doing. Keep something in mind about the Berlin speech, German citizens don’t vote in the USA.

We wanted change, and instead we are getting back what we threw away, Donna Brazile, Solis Doyle-fired by Hillary Clinton, has joined Obama, and Communications Director Robert Gibbs who was previously press secretary for John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign, has gone on board also. One certainly cannot fault fund raising Whiz, Chief Hyatt board member Penny Pritzker, because by the end of March, Obama had raised over $235 million during the course of his campaign.

It is, however, not the money of which I speak, it is the seeming to embrace the things people hate Bush for, and escape the things, people supported him for up until Hillary left the race.

Now he speaks of moving troops from Iraq to Afghanistan (Was it true that Big Oil wanted Bill to protect the oil Lines, but that Bill Clinton refused to Bribe the Taliban to lay-off-sabotaging the pipe-lines? Would they have cooperated and grabbed the “Protection money?” Was Bill’s refusal to give over the cash, the true reason why he was impeached? His refusal to bow to Big Oil’s request that we fund a buy-off, pay-off, protection racket of $2 billion to the Taliban, to “Guard” the oil pipe-line, was especially bitter since the Taliban made several visits to Crawford during the Clinton years? Is it also true that the Fascists, holding Nazi War Criminal cash, in opposition and violation of the Trading With The Enemies Act of 1941, built a Fascist infrastructure in South America and the USA and the Clinton Persecution by all parties was a large step in the current fascist regime and a continuation of the 1,000 year Reign of the Third Reich?

Are, therefore, Obama and McCain unknowingly being used by forces indebted to a united fascism? And if so, for whom do we vote, if both key candidates are, without their own consciousness, going to be manipulated by forces illegal, according to violations of the Trading With The Enemies Act of 1941? Is that Act still available to prosecute under? If so, since the US government once froze all funds of Prescott Bush’s companies which were allegedly Trading with the enemy, and since in violation of that law Bush held money in escrow for a Nazi War Criminal until 1951, when that alleged war criminal could settle into an estate in South America, under the Racketeering Act, the Ricoh Act,
could not it be said that profits earned while holding such money, was the root of the current Bush family fortune, which funded all of the other enterprises including the Carlisle Fund? If so, then could not the Justice department freeze, seize and confiscate all of their present wealth?

If indeed, there was a substantial sum of money inherited by any of the Bush family from Bush’s grandfather, Prescott who also allegedly attempted to hire the 500,000 WW I Veterans in Washington camping in the parks seeking their pensions, to assassinate FDR, why could not the government seek Post-Humus prosecution and freeze seize all Bush family wealth?

If, undercover, agents have been secretly working, financed by Fascist agents from South Americ a, those same agents whose goal in WW II was to confiscate Mideast oil supplies under the able charge of the Desert Fox Erwin Rommel General, are they at work in the Bush regime? Was not Richard Cheney a great admirer of Prescott Bush?
Are not the goals of the New World Order war criminals the same as those of the Nazi’s under Hitler, to grab the oil and rule the world? Are not the every actions of the Bushites, the same as those of Hitler?

If, indeed, all roads lead to domination of world oil supplies that goal was inherited by the current Bushites, and their undercover agents have infiltrated, without the knowledge of either candidate, are we not locked into their goals no matter whom we elect?

Is it not, then immediately necessary to destroy the vast sources of wealth which lead to such activities which goals have already disabled an American president, (Clinton) destroyed the Constitution and Bill of rights, stolen two elections and maybe even the Texas governorship twice?

Have you noticed that neither candidate has said one word about eliminating the Military Commissions Act of 2006, or the Patriot Act?

Therefore, is it not mandatory that those two laws be made impotent and that we begin an investigation into seizing all Bush family wealth?

This sounds like an old conspiracy theory movie plot, but my experience is that everything which ever occurred in the history of man, was the result of careful long range planning, which some call conspiracies and other’s, who never plan anything and whose education in history is sadly lacking, and which suffer from IQ deficiencies, call, with hostility, conspiracy theories.

So, the question is: Should the US Government Begin Confiscation of all Bush Family wealth under the Trading With The Enemies Act of 1941, and the Ricoh Confiscation Act, at once? SHALL WE PURSUE THEM BY ALL MEANS POSSIBLE, OR LET THEM DESTROY AMERICA AS THEY SEE FIT?

HELL YES! GO GET THE BUSH WEALTH!

HELL NO! LET THEM KEEP IT!

Invite Your Friend(s) to Vote: