OpEdNews Op Eds

"Free Trade." Translation: Whatever Helps Multinational Businesses

By       Message Dustin Ensinger     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

2   1   1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/1/09

- Advertisement -
The hypocrisy of pundits, politicians and business leaders is amazing.  Those aforementioned people are the first to decry anything done in the nations interest economically as “protectionism” and they are the same people distorting “free trade” by backing bailouts, stimulus spending, tax abatement and other trade distorting policies.   

If you dig a bit further into the legislative and lobbying priorities of those politicians and businesses now fighting off “protectionism,” you see that by “free trade” many powerful folks in Washington really mean whatever policies help well-connected multinational businesses,” San Francisco Examiner columnist Timothy P. Carney writes.   

Carney points out that the man now in charge of the U.S. Commerce Department - an agency vital to the nation’s trade policies - is a walking contradiction and a shining example of this double standard.   

Former Washington governor Gary Locke is an avid “free trader.”  During his time as governor, from 1997 to 2004, he led eight trade missions to China to support increasing business between the Communist regime and Washington.  

"I believe it's in the interests of the United States politically and economically to forge a strong partnership with China,” The Seattle Times quoted him as saying in 2006. “If the Chinese can't buy U.S. products, they'll buy them from European countries and then develop stronger economic ties with France and Germany and perhaps side more with those countries when international issues flare up."  

Yet, at the same time, Locke engineered a $3.2 billion package of tax breaks to Boeing - a $3.2 billion distortion of trade.   

Exempting our largest exporter from tax laws that apply to other businesses is effectively an export subsidy,” Carney writes.  “The Department of Commerce is, in essence, providing corporate welfare.  But these government interventions don’t seem to bother today’s free-trade evangelists.” 

- Advertisement -

Another perfect example of the trade hypocrisy demonstrated by the-powers-that-be was during the debate surrounding the most recent stimulus package.  While a business lobbying group made up of the nation’s top CEO’s was salivating over the idea of billions of dollars in taxpayer money wantonly handed out to their members, they adamantly opposed the “buy America” provision in the package.   

The bottom line is, an unfettered “free trade” agenda is espoused by corporate America and their enablers in Washington only when it will be good for big business.  When protectionist measures are imposed that are good for big business, those same critic’s lips are sealed.   

This is the big business argument: Lowering trade barriers and subsidizing certain business activities are good for the economy,” Carney writes.  “That’s a debatable stance, but at least it’s honest.  The politicians, on the other hand, praise “free trade” as a matter of principle, while abandoning that principle at home.” 
 

- Advertisement -

 

Dustin Ensinger graduated from The Ohio State University with a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Political Science. He is a contributing journalist for EconomyInCrisis.org.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

American Government Facilitating in U.S. Titans' Downfall

American Businesses Waging War Against America

New Legislation Aims to Protect Against Toxic Imports

China Investing in U.S. Mortgages

Time to Change the Failing Status Quo