Rousseau's concept of the general will proved irresistible to future court intellectuals, as it perfectly conflated society and state, as useful trick indeed. "With the [subsequent] rise of democracy,"- Rothbard wrote, "it is common to hear sentiments expressed which violate virtually every tenet of reason and common sense: such as '-we are the government.' The useful collective term '-we' has enabled an ideological camouflage to be thrown over the reality of political life. If 'we are the government,' then anything a government does to an individual is not only just and tyrannical; it is also 'voluntary' on the part of the individual concerned. If the government has incurred a huge public debt which must be paid by taxing one group for the benefit of another, this reality of burden is obscured by saying that '-we owe it to ourselves;' if the government conscripts a man, or throws him into jail for dissident opinion, then he is '-doing it to himself' and therefore nothing untoward has occurred."
Observing the power of "the myth that says we are governing ourselves,"- Lew Rockwell notes that whereas "[k]ings of old would have been overthrown in short order if they had tried to grab 40 percent of people's earnings, or told them how big to make their toilet tanks, or determined how schools taught every subject," modern Americans "turn a blind eye to petty tyrannies in our midst." As Bovard comments, it is as if "[b]eing permitted to vote for politicians who enact unjust, oppressive new laws magically converts the stripes on prison shirts into emblems of freedom."
Wise up, America. There's nothing special about 50% plus one. Truth and justice cannot be determined by a show of hands. We are not the government. Voting is not a sacrament. And as it stands today, when we're only given a choice between two Establishment approved candidates, voting is a joke.
Voltaire, the undisputed leader of the Enlightenment, used humor and wit as two of his primary weapons, and, as Robert Ingersoll remarked, "In the presence of absurdity he laughed". It was largely by making the divine right of kings a laughing stock that the Enlightenment writers destroyed it. It is time for us to do the same thing to the divine right of the majority.
This year, vote laughing or stay home.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
3
1
1
