Who ordered the attack and who carried out the attack? The story says Osama Bin Laden ordered the attack and that 19 suicidal fanatics carried it out. If this were the case, the FBI would list Bin Laden as being wanted for the crime. They do not, due to, ‘no hard evidence’. [1] If 19 suicidal fanatics carried out the attack, then they would’ve been captured on the security cameras for the actual flights they were, allegedly, boarding. There would be clear passenger lists from the airlines stating their names. Neither proof is available. There was never any Arab DNA found at any of the scenes. There is no proof that Bin Laden ordered the attack or that 19 suicidal fanatics carried out the attack. None.
The story says that four airliners were hijacked and flown in American airspace for over an hour and a half, never intercepted, and that three of the four reached their targets. In addition, two of the airliners, completely disappeared upon impact. There is no forensic, scientific proof that the airliners, said to be hijacked that day, were traced to their impact sites. They were not identified by their tail numbers. What’s more, the Pentagon and Shanksville crime scenes lack any physical evidence whatsoever, that an airliner and its passengers crashed at those sites. There were no titanium engines, no tail sections, no fuselages, no seats, no bodies and no body parts found.[2] There is no proof that airliners crashed in Shanksville and into the Pentagon. None.
The story says that three skyscrapers in New York City completely collapsed to dust at close to freefall speed, because two planes hit the two larger towers. The NIST Report (National Institute on Safety and Standards) ignored the third tower completely and their explanation of the ‘catastrophic collapses’ has changed three times and has never been independently proven tenable. There is not one peer reviewed study to support the government-funded assertions. The laws of physics were violated if those three buildings fell at close to freefall speed, with no additional source of energy. The laws of the physical universe were suspended if those three buildings fell with no resistance. Buildings do not collapse into toxic dust, unless other, physically explainable, forces are present.
What are you using for proof; science or magic, reality or faith?
At this point you should be asking yourself why you believe the story. Instead of leaning on excuses to believe the story, you should be asking for proof of the story. You should be asking yourself what you fear and why do you fear it?
When you are facing the end of freedom, state sponsored censorship, state sponsored torture, permanent war, permanent debt and servitude; you should be asking if suicidal terrorists really created all of this? If you are an intellectual, you should be embarrassed for accepting at face value, a story with no basis in fact.
As a patriot, you should be so frightened by what has become of our once free nation, that you are willing to look at all of the causes for the decline in detail and as a way of knowing, so that you may act to save your republic from its fall. As a conservative, you should be questioning how your convictions have been so openly betrayed. As a liberal, you should be passionately questioning stolen elections, complicit Democratic representatives and blatant power grabs, all in the name of a story.
Who told you the story? Who told them to tell you the story? Who told them to keep repeating the story and to never investigate, to never question and to never expose? Is there any evidence to support the story? Is there any evidence that contradicts the story?
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
