One of them is Jeane Manning, the author of "Breakthrough Power," (along with Joel Garbon). You can listen to her speak on http://alturl.com/q9ea, 1100 listeners logged on. "Breakthrough Power: how quantum-leap new energy inventions can transform our world," is a compendium of energy technologies and the rocky road inventors trudge.
"In the 1980s co-author Jeane Manning began interviewing inventors, inventions and scientists who want to save the world by offering clean energy abundance. To her dismay, she found that many stories of suppression of energy breakthroughs are true." A quote from http://breakthroughpower.net/Media.html. (Editor's note: Link doesn't work) Ms. Manning wants her book in every classroom in every school.
Manning talks about the "proof of principle" as "crossing the (mind) mine fields, with all it's dangers," as an inventor crosses the bridge from the invention, still in the mind, jumping to the production of an actual product. In this interview, she identifies various individuals and situations - how it went for them to include inventor suppression on many levels.
There was a Dr. Romberg, Ms. Manning met in Toronto 9 years ago. From her interview she learned that though he had a Ph.D. in psychology, he had come to invent something (the size of a refrigerator - he called it his black box") to power his home off the grid.
He invited the local power company over to view turning off the lights in his house; he then disappeared briefly and the lights came back on. He told them, "I will put you out of business in 6 months." I guess the utility felt threatened. Soon, an officer from the RCMP (Mounties), paid him a visit. He must cease building his invention for 30 years; Dr. Romberg dismantled his invention.
At this point, Todd states that any effort to stop inventors in moving forward will not be tolerated. He sounds tough. Will the gauntlet toss work.
What can help? Jeane Manning mentions an inventor she knows an inventor who instead of an engineering or physics background, has a degree in Business"that this knowledge is particularly handy, to say the least. She mentions, especially with negotiations, to watch out for "shut up" clause in a contract, and a "performance clause" so you can continue to invent.
Todd then speaks of the responsibility inventors have for improving the world's condition, that there is power in a community of inventors. Jeane Manning and he discuss the murder of Eugene Malov, that it was done as a warning to other inventors - hush. She believes this only serves to strengthen their resolve. www.breakthroughpower.net
The next and final speaker is Tom Bearden, who can be heard on the archive http://.comhttp://www.opednews.com/populum//2eme (Editor's note: Link doesn't work) with 1523 listeners logged in; Bearden has a good reputation and name recognition in the invention community. Leslie Pastor is moderator, leading the questions with Dr. Bearden. This is a must hear for his broad and detailed knowledge of physics, engineering and research - he has met, worked with, and led many of the leaders in various disciplines today, and he can communicate the details without becoming a living textbook.
When you listen to Dr. Bearden, tune your ear for key explanations, like "Conservation of Energy" theory and the "Second Law of Thermodynamics." Involving physical reality and unified theories, he says we and especially EEs (electrical engineers) were incorrectly taught. We must start again with Nicola Tesla, who not only invented the radio (as Les Pastor said), but happened upon the asymmetrical system current or AC which can/does defeat the theory of Conservation of Energy, while Thomas Edison was working with symmetrical or direct current or DC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Currents
Dr. Bearden explains that with DC, you need to continuously put in energy, where as Tesla found "you don't need more fuel - you take energy from the medium (or vacuum). This would be overunity. Tesla visited new energy societies of his era - no TV or internet then so you had to make personal appearances - promoting his discoveries, but he was up against a powerful wall.
J.P. Morgan was funding Edison and developing the fledgling General Electrics Co. He was developing electrical engineering as a science where there had been none before. Morgan would not let the new science include any study or even mention an asymmetrical current system. From those times - 1892 - until now, EEs do not learn about asymmetrical current. "Electrical engineers were crippled deliberately."
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
