- Bush would announce that event to be an act of war and the Iraqi war train was to start in full speed.
I still believe that the Y2000-Y2001 events before 9/11 were all dedicated to the preparation of the of the group to act but the plan was not to be exercised on 9/11. The go signal on that day was due to an emergency.
What I think really happened.
Osama Bin Ladin and Mohammed Atta had their own agenda from the start. Those two presumed to go along and follow suite with their US/Israeli enablers up to the point the planes were in the air, possibly for a dry run for the long-term operation. Then they planned to ram them into the WTC Towers and the Pentagon as they did with the Flights 11, 175 and 77 on 9/11. I have severe doubts about the group on Flight 93 though. Considering the amazing fact that flight 93 took off from Newark at 8:42am , four minutes before the North Tower was struck it does seem prudent to consider that the terrorists on it already knew that the enablers’ plan had gone awry.
If they were pursuing the same fate as Atta they should have proceeded towards NY or Washington immediately. Meanwhile they wobbled a lot before requesting a new flight plan which was unusual on its own. My guess is they were is disarray. They did not know what to do. At first they started to exercise the original plan by announcing that ‘there was a bomb aboard’ [Re; the book by D. R. Griffin, The 9/11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions, p.148]. Then they started to think Washington. By that time it was too late and I believe Professor Griffin in his claim that the Flight 93 was shot down, Cheney or not Cheney in charge.
Returning back to that fateful event I would state that Atta and his guys played dumb for a long time. They studied in the flight schools while already having the necessary skills. They played along and got what they wanted- the unlimited capability off moving through the US without any concern about survelliance.
I believe that by 9/11 the groups assigned were not ready yet to function though. Many of the participants did not know English well enough. They needed more time. Still, they were given a signal to go for a real operation, not even a dry run which they might expect. There had to be some reason for it, some emergency circumstance.
I believe that circumstance was the leak. Someone leaked something. There were several attempts to do that before 9/11. That report Condi did not care to understand was one of them. That message to the Israeli company was the message from the same source of the leak when he/she realized that the plan had a go. It was an act of desperation. The folks in the Odigo branch in NY were most likely there so early to talk with the Israel proper and the whistleblower was expecting an immediate reaction from Israel on the international wavelength, so to speak. He/she was expecting that on the news channel right away big time. Atta was in the air at that moment, heading for Boston. The whole plan could be called off in Boston if necessary.
It wasn’t. When Atta boarded the Flight 11 he received his orders as well as the others boarding other flights. The organizers could expect with high probability that all the designated flights would be let to take off even if the hijacking took place.
The rest we know. The three groups on flights 11,175 and 77 did their jobs. The group on Flight 93 wobbled, then decided to go along with the Atta’s scenario but was shot down.
As for the WTC towers I believe that all three were brought down by the series of controlled demolition explosions but only the building 7 was brought down deliberately. I think the charges were installed in those buildings long ago as a precautionary measure against the possible catastrophic fall horizontally. Those charges were controlled by a sophisticated electronics and software, most likely some analogue system, reliable but old- fashioned, full of additional controls, maybe even poorly maintained. The whole behavior of the people on the ground,: sending firemen into the towers, no attempt to evacuate Manhattan, etc.- shows that those people did not ever contemplate that the towers might fall, horizontally or otherwise. The point of no return, I think, took place when the self- demolition electronics malfunctioned in both high towers after those were hit and triggered the process. That could have happened for many reasons but primarily heat comes to mind as well as series of electric short- circuiting. BTW, was the power to those buildings shut down or not?
The building 7 apparently contained some command switchboard for that demolition system and that is why it had to be brought down; so that the compromising evidence of such system being there would never come up.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
