Roger,
In regards to your "coverage" of campus crest communities' and the balcony incident, a fair reporter would have noted the balcony only had a overall depth of 6". The pictures that are available online show that these are simply for aesthetics. The story, available on CBS' local site, proves that this incident was caused by a group of young college kids acting inappropriately at 3am. The size of the landing area of the balcony is less than the size of the so called victims' shoes. This aesthetic architecture/design has been utilized for centuries. At what point are people held liable for their own actions? I guess there is always someone to blame? If that is the case, where does liability of the local governing agencies(inspections dept) ever kick in. That is never mentioned in your "coverage"! Selective reporting with a political agenda? Seems like it to me, and others. . . .
Roger,
This email is to serve as notice to stop any attempt at contacting me. This is also to serve as notice not to write anything about me or involving me. You do not have consent from me to write anything regarding myself or my family. Do not contact me in any form from this point on.
Zac Parrish
Zac:
For the record, I don't need your consent to write on matters that involve you. You have every right to decline to be interviewed, and I will respect that. But you do not, and will not, control what I write regarding matters of public record--and they do involve you, whether you like it or not.
You've been given every opportunity to comment, and you've declined. That's fine. Now I will move forward with my reporting. If you change your mind in the next few days, I'm still open to an interview--in person or otherwise.
Roger
From: Zac Parrish
To: Roger Shuler
Again,
Roger,
This email, and the previous, is to serve as notice to stop any attempt at contacting me. This is also to serve as notice not to write anything about me or involving me. You do not have consent from me to write anything regarding myself or my family. Do not contact me in any form from this point on.
Your continued efforts to discuss/publish these private matters are rapidly escalating to harassment.
----------------------
From: Roger Shuler
To: Zac Parrish
Again:
For the record, I don't need your consent to write on matters that involve you. You have every right to decline to be interviewed, and I will respect that. But you do not, and will not, control what I write regarding matters of public record . . .
FYI--You might want to educate yourself on the legal term harassment. You clearly don't know what it is.
---------------------
From: Zac Parrish
To: Roger Shuler
For the fourth time(once verbal, 3emails)
---------------------
From: Roger Shuler
To: Zac Parrish
You can send me threats and warnings to infinity, but I've been a reporter for 30 years, and I know what I can and cannot publish under the law. No amount of huffing and puffing from you is going to change that.
I accept that you don't want to be interviewed, and I offered to discontinue this back-and-forth a few hours ago. But you persist in contacting me. As far as I'm concerned the conversation is over unless you decide to grant an interview. But my reporting is moving forward either way. I simply will state that you declined to answer questions.
---------------------
From: Zac Parrish
To: Roger Shuler
For the fifth time(once verbal, 4emails)