Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 14 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 3/10/09

A Real Stem-Cell Twister

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Message Stephen Pizzo
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)


(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA
 

So, Obama reverses Bush's ban on funding fetal stem cell research and the religious right (along with  the sycophantic pols whose only vote-getting trick is to pander to them) came out of the woodwork.

Because, you see, using these 150 cell-bundles (blastocysts) for research is “killing babies.”

Let's just let that huge cognitive absurdity pass. We all know how both sides of that argument goes already. Boy, do we.

No, what I want to focus on today is this; where have all these blastocyst savers been over the last 25 years? Oh sure, they've been harassing women trying to get family planning services at Planned Parenthood clinics, but that's just one place where the “murders” were occurring.

Let me explain.

The fetal cell tissue Obama will now allow to be used in research comes from some of the 600,000 fertilized eggs, frozen and stored at fertility clinics. That's how many of the unused frozen fertilized eggs are disposed of – an unceremonious burial in red plastic bags marked, “medical waste.”

So, where were these self righteous protectors of the blastocyst while all that was going on?
I'll tell you where they weren't – they weren't protesting outside fertility clinics, that's for damn sure.  All these years, all those protests in from of family planning clinics, a not a single right to lifer protesting the 600,000 blastocysts dumped in medical waste bags and deposited in the trash -- year in, year out – and it didn't seem to phase them one little bit. (When was the last time you read of a right-to-lifer taking a shot at a fertility clinic doc or harassing women going in to one to have their eggs fertilized and frozen -- of which some will almost certainly be destroyed later?)

In fact the so-called “pro-life” community didn't even get around to acknowledging the whole fertility clinics thing until pro-choice forces pointed out this humungous contradiction. That's when their holier than thou leaders, like the obsequious Tony Perkins, cooked up the idea of “Snowflake Babies.”

The idea was to encourage infertile couples to “adopt” these unwanted frozen blastocysts and save them for destruction. . (Unless of course you're a gay couple -- in which case they prefer the red bag instead.)

So, how's the whole snowflake campaign going? After almost eight years there's now just a tad over 300 snowflake children. It's a number that is statistically insignificant as that would number would have been met anyway, since egg donation was a trend that predated the whole flaky “snowflake” diversion.

During the years the Bush administration accommodated these anti-science morons they remained reasonably quiet. But they were back in full force this week when Obama lifted that ban.

Their argument, once again, is that every fertilized egg deserves “the right to life,” by which I assume they mean a full-term, walking around, eating, driving a car and voting kind of life. And how do they propose to secure life's Full Monty for the frozen cells at fertility clinics?

They want the ban Obama lifted yesterday, reinstated. Never mind that means 599,700 of their imaginary frozen humans will be “disposed of” every year. Or that along with them will go any scientific knowledge those cell-bundles may carry that could save the lives millions of non-imaginary, full-term humans in the future. They don't care. What they care about is reinstating the ban on federal funds being used for something they find morally objectionable.

Rate It | View Ratings

Stephen Pizzo Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Stephen Pizzo has been published everywhere from The New York Times to Mother Jones magazine. His book, Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans, was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Secrets Kill Too

Dying for Change

What's the Matter With Gaza?

Who You Callin' Un-American?

Worst Clinton Contributor Ever

I Was At the Birth...

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend