There is always
dichotomy. Representatives of authority will
frequently omit the fact there is dichotomy, when it suits them. For instance both the right and the left wing,
of any country, for this is a global phenomenon whether they are called
Republicans and Democrats or something else, use the same logic to discount the
logic of their adversaries -when it suits them.
They both operate the same and criticize each other in the same
ways. Socrates is famous for advocating the
idea that logic is flawed. When it comes
to the narrative of authorities this is especially true.
Institutions despise criticism that doesn't
fall into the dichotomous nuances they are prepared for, the flawed logic which
appeals to the attention of the majority.
In order to make enhanced observations for questioning or criticizing institutions
one has to question the generality of actuality and then boil it down and focus
in.
There are a wide variety
of institutions in the world, but when you boil it down, there are just three
types of institutions in the world; religious, government and corporate. The United States is an institution. However it was, at least partially founded on preventing
the collectivism of these types of institutions. Note the system of checks and balances within
government and the notion of the separation of church and state, as well as the
former notion of separation of corporate and state.
All institutions are oligarchical, authoritative
and they all, when you boil it down, simply promote and prohibit. All institutions simply promote and prohibit,
that's it. The variances of what they promote
and prohibit is colorful, but boil it down and that's all, all institutions do. The logic for their reason varies far and
wide and yet, no matter the reasoning, that's all institutions do in the end,
promote and prohibit.
When institutions
are allowed to interlink together, it is normally at the cost of individuals. Oligarchical collectivism is the phrase
coined by Orwell in 1984 used to express the interlinking of institutions,
which the U.S.A. formerly, expressly sought to prevent.
What institutions promote
and prohibit, when we boil it down, through what I call the philosophy of the duality
of polarity, is either in the direction of institutionalization or individuation. All institutions either promote or prohibit
actuality which is for or against institutions and individuals. The world is controlled by institutional
policies which are negative or positive and through the philosophy of the duality
of polarity a fair understanding of boiled down generalities is specified. This is a world of the promotion of
institutionalization and prohibition of individuation.
As I was writing
and exploring the idea of the philosophy of the duality of polarity, as the
Occupy Wall Street Movement transformed and then began fading because of what
some said was lacking of cohesive declaration I asked myself what is the
simplest and yet most powerful dichotomy.
I asked myself what is the starkest pro-institutional situation? And conversely what is the starkest anti-individual
situation? Further which of these
systems are, no matter the diversity of the world's authorities, global? This is where to make a stand, I thought,
this is where to declare.
The most
pro-institutional situation on the planet is one which only benefits
authorities and was invented to kill mass amounts of people. The promotion of nuclear experimentation has
destroyed numerous portions of the earth, through intentional detonation and
accidental consequences. Nuclear
experimentation benefits the oligarchical status quo and costs the health and
wellbeing of all individuals and all life for that matter. Nuclear experimentation is pro-institutional,
beyond that, it is anti-life. Nuclear
experimentation builds the military industrial complex and the energy oligarchy
of extraction, refinement and hazardous ignition of materials so endlessly deadly
the process could only be compared to opening Pandora itself. Nuclear experimentation is pro-institutional,
otherwise it is death.
Some nuclear experimentation facts: http://www.brookings.edu/about/projects/archive/nucweapons/50
http://www.neis.org/literature/Brochures/npfacts.htm
The most anti-individual
situation on the planet is one which inhibits individual rights to farm a plant
used by ancient peoples to make everything from bridges to medicines. The prohibition of marijuana and hemp is the
most anti-individual global situation on the planet. Not only are people made criminal through laws
based on the intoxicating effects of marijuana, but the agricultural potential
of hemp cultivation to make everything from clothing to buildings is
eliminated, as well as its medicinal powers.
There is no other global situation more anti-individual than prohibition
of marijuana and hemp cultivation.
Marijuana and hemp facts:
http://www.hempfarm.org/Papers/Hemp_Facts.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).