41 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 2/7/12

Barrack Obama and Christian Apologist C.S. Lewis

Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bob Johnson
Obama saved?
Obama saved?
(Image by NewsTechnica)
  Details   DMCA


Last Thursday Barack Obama gave a speech at the National Prayer Breakfast. The National Prayer Breakfast is an opportunity for politicians of both parties to attempt to win favor with religious voters. Sometimes speeches by politicians at religious events like this can reveal their ignorance of history. For example, at the Religious Broadcasters Convention Ronald Reagan told the televangelists that Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson would be proud of the work the charlatans were doing! It's obvious that Reagan was ignorant of the fact that Paine and Jefferson were not Christians, but both of them were Deists.

On Thursday, Obama, after letting the crowd know that he had found Jesus many years ago, showed his ignorance of the famous Christian apologist C.S. Lewis. One of Lewis' books which he is most famous for is Mere Christianity. The Christian monthly Christianity Today voted this book as the third most influential book in the shaping of the minds of Christian evangelicals. Obama said, "In the words of C.S. Lewis, 'Christianity has not, and does not profess to have a detailed political program. It is meant for all men at all times, and the particular program which suited one place or time would not suit another.'"

Like the Bible Lewis promoted, Lewis seems to suffer from ambiguity (the Bible isn't even clear on how to save your eternal soul, the biggest selling point of Christianity). After writing the above, he writes about what a Christian society would be like. He writes, "the New Testament, without going into details, gives us a pretty clear hint of what a fully Christian society would be like. Perhaps it gives us more than we can take. It tells us that there are to be no passengers or parasites: if man does not work, he ought not to eat. Every one is to work with his own hands, and what is more, every one's work is to produce something good: there will be no manufacture of silly luxuries and then of sillier advertisements to persuade us to buy them. And there is to be no 'swank' or 'side,' no putting on airs. To that extent a Christian society would be what we now call Leftist. On the other hand, it is always insisting on obedience -- obedience (and outward marks of respect) from all of us to properly appointed magistrates, from children to parents, and (I am afraid this is going to be very unpopular) from wives to husbands. Thirdly, it is to be a cheerful society: full of singing and rejoicing, and regarding worry or anxiety as wrong. Courtesy is one of the Christian virtues; and the New Testament hates what it calls 'busybodies.'"

As I wrote in my book, An Answer to C.S. Lewis' Mere Christianity (for the Kindle version click here) , what Lewis is describing is nothing but a cult. It reminds me of the Stepford Wives where the women are all obedient to their husbands and society is loaded with phoney smiles and disingenuous politeness.

Lewis also ignores the fact that the Bible gives us an example of what early Christian society was like. In a nutshell, it was nothing but raw Communism. The average person was expected to sell all they had and give the proceeds to the apostles who were then supposed to divide it among all of the Christians. If they did not do this they would be killed. However, they would not be killed by the NKVD or KGB, but by the Bible god!

Acts 4:34-5:11 makes this very clear. It tells the story of a man and his wife who sold their land but did not give all of the money from the sale of their land to the apostles. Verses 5:1-11 read, "But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, and kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles' feet.

"But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?

"Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.

"And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.

"And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him.

"And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in.

"And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much.

"Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out.

"Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband.

"And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things."

Just as Communism relies on "great fear" in order to control the people, so does Christianity.

Lewis believed society should be based on everyone showing obedience to "properly appointed magistrates" (although he doesn't define "properly appointed"), and that children should be obedient to their parents and that wives should be obedient to their husbands. It's not difficult to understand why Obama, or any politician, would be in favor of a society so ordered. The government loves obedient subjects. Perhaps the Bible's insistence on people being obedient to governmental authority figures is one reason they enjoy tax benefits denied to the rest of us.

One powerful Bible teaching Obama and his cohorts in Washington probably greatly appreciate is Romans 13:1-7. This piece of propaganda openly claims that government figures and the "powers that be" are in their position of power because God put them there! And if you do not obey them or actually resist them, then you are resisting God and will suffer damnation. This must mean America's founders, who  the religious right praise every July 4th, men like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine are all now suffering damnation for not only resisting, but for rebelling against and killing the powers that be during the American Revolution.

Obama, and all the politicians, should think twice before endorsing a society based on the Bible and Christianity. There are very good reasons why America's founders refused to create a theocracy.
Rate It | View Ratings

Bob Johnson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bob Johnson is a paralegal and a freelance writer in Florida. He was raised Roman Catholic, but after reading Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason, he became a Deist. In 1993 he founded the World Union of Deists and in 1996 he launched the first web (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Michele Bachmann Exposes the Deadly Superstitions of the Religious Right

Join the US Military and Die For Israel

Ronald Reagan: The Father of the Debtor Nation

Religious Right Attacks Elizabeth Edwards' Deism

Should Religions be Held Accountable for Their Promises?

Was C.S. Lewis, Author of Mere Christianity, an Intellectual?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend