55 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Conservative Organizations: Whistleblower Protection is Taxpayer Protection!

By Conservative Public Interest Union  Posted by James Murtagh (about the submitter)   No comments

 

Whistleblower protection is sometimes portrayed as a liberal issue. That is absolutely untrue. It was Abraham Lincoln who enacted the first whistleblower laws to stop defense contractors from stealing in the Civil War. Later, Ronald Reagan modernized Whistleblower protection as part of his war on "waste, fraud and abuse" of federal taxpayers.

 

Some of the blue-chip conservatives championing Whistleblower Protection include Senator Grassley. This is a bipartisan effort. Conservatives hate waste and fraud, and liberals want to protect the safety net. Whistleblower protection is the one issue that people of integrity can all agree on.

 

Yesterday, a number of Conservative groups sent the following letter to Congress. There is now no excuse. Both presidential candidates and both parties need to embrace Whistleblower Protection as one of the most important issues of the day. With the huge bailout of financial systems coming, we must insist that whistleblowers be protected to avoid future disasters, and to ensure the huge amounts of public moneys will be spent wisely and legally.

 

An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress from Conservative Organizations: 

Whistleblower Protection is Taxpayer Protection! 

 

 

Dear Congress, 

 

We, the undersigned organizations, representing millions of Americans who support lower taxes and limited government, urge you to send reconciled legislation restoring Congress’s intent behind the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) to the President’s desk before the House and Senate adjourn this year. 

 

Whistleblowers have historically made valuable contributions to the cause of overburdened taxpayers, from uncovering improper subsidy payments to identifying abuses of power at the Internal Revenue Service. Unfortunately, at a time when America most urgently needs the best value for every dollar Washington spends, these victories for taxpayers are likely to be rarer. Despite the fact that whistleblower protection statutes were unanimously enacted in 1989 and 1994, a series of hostile court rulings has effectively gutted these laws and left employees fearful of coming forward. 

 

As who have long expressed concerns over the encroachment of the judicial branch on lawmaking powers, we know of few more powerful illustrations of the problem than the courts’ depredations upon the letter and spirit of the WPA. Since 1994, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against whistleblowers on the merits in 203 out of 205 decisions. 

 

Both the Government Accountability Office and the Inspectors General have key roles in rooting out wasted taxpayer money, but even these dedicated agencies are not often able to report fiscal foul-ups as they are happening. Whistleblowers, who witness on a daily basis the malfunctioning machinery of government, are best suited to such a task. Yet understandably, few of them wish to martyr their families in doing so. 

 

H.R. 985 and S. 274, which overwhelmingly passed the House and Senate, respectively, would help to shield whistle-blowing employees from retaliation when they provide credible information about waste, fraud, and abuse. Reforms include the right to a jury trial, safeguards for workers with federal contractors, and repeal of the Federal Circuit’s destructive monopoly on precedent-setting decisions in whistleblower cases. 

 

We are aware of objections to these bills from the Administration and others, who fear the implications they would have for national security or for human resources procedures. These arguments, however, are unpersuasive. Nothing in H.R. 985 and S. 274 would permit classified information in whistleblower cases to be made public. Furthermore, a robust whistleblower process would allow more substantive fiscal mismanagement complaints to be heard, as opposed to “grievance mills” (such as the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission and the Federal Labor Relations Board) that disgruntled federal employees often abuse.

 

Those institutions must be reformed as well. 

 

Congress would be doing a disservice to taxpayer advocates if it were to start from scratch on WPA next year. Largely technical matters now remain, which can be resolved if the Leadership makes a conference over H.R. 985 and S. 274 a priority. This is why the rank-and-file must communicate support for such a conference with all urgency. Once again, we implore all Members of Congress to support and vote for legislation to re-invigorate the Whistleblower Protection Act. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Pete Sepp 

Vice President for Policy and Communications 

National Taxpayers Union 

 

Michael D. Ostrolenk 

President 

American Conservative Defense Alliance 

 

Fred Smith 

President 

Competitive Enterprise Institute 

 

Tom Deweese 

President 

American Policy Center 

 

Chris Butler 

Chief of Staff 

Americans for Tax Reform 

 

Susan Stradling 

President 

Arizona Eagle Forum 

 

Doug Bandow 

Vice President for Policy 

Citizen Outreach Project 

 

Jim Babka 

President 

Downsize DC 

 

James Plummer 

Policy Director 

Liberty Coalition 

 

Dane Von Breichenruchardt 

President 

U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation 

Rate It | View Ratings

James Murtagh Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

James J. Murtagh, Jr. is a doctor of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine, and the Medical Director of several sleep laboratories in Southern Ohio. Dr. Murtagh extensively writes on medical ethics. Dr. Murtagh is the founder of a new (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Sister Aloysius "Doubts"

Sarah Palin is the Ultimate RINO

Patients and Doctors Demand Integrity in Medicine!

Sarah Palin is National Traitor

Should al-Qaeda have the right to bear arms?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend