43 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 28 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H4'ed 3/10/16

Did Novartis and Genentech Get Away with This Big Marketing Scam?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Message Martha Rosenberg
Become a Fan
  (84 fans)


Asthma is big business for Big Pharma. Advair was the third best selling drug in the world in 2013 and the asthma drugs Singulair and Symbicort were also blockbusters. So it is no surprise the prospect of a high-tech injectable drug that stops an allergic response by binding to Immunoglobulin E (IgE) made Big Pharma sit up and take notice.

Xolair, (omalizumab), developed from humanized rodent cells (yes, you read that right), is part of Big Pharma's new wave of bio-engineered liquid drugs, rolled out when blockbusters like Lipitor and Viagra went off patent. Injected drugs/biologics can earn as much as $20,000 or more per patient per year and are resistant to the quick generic competition that threatens easier-to-replicate pills. Currently biologics Humira and Enbrel are bestselling drugs.

Though Novartis and Genentech who comarketed Xolair sought FDA approval for four conditions in 2001-- pediatric and adult asthma and pediatric and adult seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms (SARS)-- the FDA only approved Xolair to treat one, in 2013--"moderate to severe persistent asthma" in patients over 12 whose symptoms are "not adequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids" and who have a positive skin test or reactivity to an allergen.

How tight are Big Pharma firms with government?
How tight are Big Pharma firms with government?
(Image by Martha Rosenberg)
  Details   DMCA

The limited number of patients who could be prescribed Xolair under this approval was a big disappointment. But so was the reason for the restricted indication: in clinical trials the FDA had detected signs of early stage malignancies! The FDA also detected many anaphylactic responses--life threatening allergic responses--which earned Xolair a black box warning. (Years later, Xolair was also linked to a higher risk of heart attack, mini-stroke, chest pain and blood clots.)

Sleazy Sales Schemes Charged

How do you sell a drug too dangerous for children and too dangerous for seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms that costs up to $24,000 a year? A drug that can only be used after corticosteroids have failed and a IgE serum test has been conducted? A drug so linked to anaphylaxis it can only be administered in a medical setting where patients have to remain for two hours of observation? (Amounting to four to eight hours of doctor and patient time a month since the drug is given every two or four weeks.)

According to whistleblowers who sold Xolair at Novartis and Genentech--with a scheme of kickbacks and bribes, misinformation about Xolair's approved uses and risks and insurance fraud.

Novartis, Genentech and Roche (which acquired Genentech in 2009) "determined as early as 2003 that they would never succeed in transforming Xolair into a blockbuster or near-blockbuster drug unless they broke the law," say their complaints. "And that is exactly what they have knowingly done, by aggressively and illegally marketing Xolair, on a national basis, to induce HCPs [health care providers] to prescribe Xolair for wide-ranging use--despite the drug's very limited efficacy and proven threats to patient safety."

According to complaints, doctors and medical staff who could boost Xolair prescriptions received American Express travelers checks, expensive tickets to sports and entertainment events, opulent meals and even a trip to the Bahamas. Often payments were disguised to look medically-related such as payments for bogus studies and to "advisory board" members, trips to "speaker" programs at fancy country clubs and casinos, unrestricted grants and honoraria of $1,000 to $3,000 that denoted no work.

Because Xolair can cost up to $24,000 a year and doctors have to sign a SMN (Statement of Medical Necessity) to assure private and government reimbursement, sales reps "instructed and nudged" office staff to submit Xolair claims "at improper rates." Reps were actually ordered to work medical settings in poor neighborhoods where patients were more likely to be on Medicaid say complaints.

Reps also conducted off-label marketing--disregarding approved FDA uses and identified risks. They were told to use the made-up term "active asthma" when calling on doctors instead "moderate to severe persistent asthma" which would have limited sales. They were also told to assure doctors a two hour wait to monitor for anaphylaxis was unnecessary and that patients in some cases could self-administer Xolair at home. And, in blatant disregard of Xolair's indications and safety profile, reps were even told to call on pediatricians and claim that Xolair was safe for children under 12 according to whistleblowers.

Why no action?

Many, perhaps most Pharma companies have settled cases pertaining to bribes, kickbacks and off-label marketing. Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Victory Pharma have settled cases in recent years.

Yet, despite an 11-year legal journey which included deposing Novartis and Genentech reps and even "wiring" one to collect evidence, whistleblower complaints have gone nowhere. Judge William Young of Boston tossed out the main complaint a year ago claiming that "fraud was probable" but an appeal is going nowhere fast.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Martha Rosenberg Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Martha Rosenberg is an award-winning investigative public health reporter who covers the food, drug and gun industries. Her first book, Born With A Junk Food Deficiency: How Flaks, Quacks and Hacks Pimp The Public Health, is distributed by (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Grassley Investigates Lilly/WebMD link Reported by Washington Post

The Drug Store in Your Tap Water

It's the Cymbalta Stupid

Are You Sure You're Not Psychotic Asks Shameless Drug Company?

Another Poorly Regulated "Derivative"--the Antidepressant Pristiq

MRSA and More. Antibiotics Linked to Obesity and Allergies, Too

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend