59 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 86 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H2'ed 7/31/11

Forget Compromise: The Debt Ceiling Is Unconstitutional

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   38 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ellen Brown
Become a Fan
  (210 fans)

The debt ceiling crisis can be averted by enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment, which mandates the government to pay its debts already incurred, including pensions.   That means Social Security, which IS an "entitlement," in the original sense of the word.   We're entitled to it because we've paid for it with taxes.      

The game of Russian roulette being played with the U.S. federal debt has been called a "grotesque political carnival" and political blackmail.   The uproar stems from a statute that is unique to the United States and never did make much sense.   First passed in 1917 and revised multiple times since, it imposes a dollar limit on the federal debt.   What doesn't make sense is that the same Congress that voted on the statute votes on the budget, which periodically exceeds the limit, requiring the statute to be revised.   The debt ceiling has been raised 74 times since 1962, 10 of them since 2001.   The most recent   increase, to $14.294 trillion by H.J.Res. 45, was signed into law on February 12, 2010.  

Taxes aren't collected until after th e annual budget is passed, so Congress can't know in advance whether or how much additional borrowing will be required.   Inevitably, there will be some years that the budget pushes the debt over the limit, requiring new legislation.   And inevitably, now that this tactic has been discovered, there will be a costly battle over the increase, wasting congressional time, destabilizing markets, and rattling faith in the American financial and political systems.   There will be continual blackmail, arm-twisting and concessions.   The situation is untenable and cries out for a definitive resolution.            

Fortunately, there is one.   A bevy of legal scholars are recommending that the issue be eliminated altogether by playing the Constitutional trump card.   The Fourteenth Amendment provides at Section 4:

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.

Where statute and the Constitution collide, the Constitution prevails.   Whether the government should pay the bills it has already incurred is not a matter of negotiation.   It is a Constitutional mandate.   And those are the bills we are talking about here, as President Obama stressed in his remarks on the issue last Friday.   He said:

Raising the debt ceiling simply gives our country the ability to pay the bills that Congress has already racked up.   I want to emphasize that.   The debt ceiling does not determine how much more money we can spend, it simply authorizes us to pay the bills we already have racked up.  It gives the United States of America the ability to keep its word. 

Ignoring the debt ceiling on Constitutional grounds would not, as Michelle Bachmann declares, make President Obama a "dictator."   It would simply mean he is complying with his Constitutional mandate to pay the government's bills on time and in full.  

Social Security Is Not Welfare.   It Is a Debt Due and Owing.

The President could have a clean resolution of the issue, but he is not jumping at the opportunity.   Rather, he appears to be ready to throw Granny under the bus by slashing Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, all in the name of "compromise."  

The Fourteenth Amendment says debts already incurred shall not be questioned, "including debts incurred for payment of pensions."   That includes Social Security, which is an "entitlement" in the true sense of the word: we're entitled to it because we've already paid for it.   In fact, the Social Security Act was originally sold to Congress and the nation in 1935 not as a government benefit, but as a retirement savings program. Earlier this year, the Urban Institute published a study evaluating the program in this way, concluding that the average worker who retires today will withdraw from Social Security just about the same amount he put in over the years, with a modest 2% real interest rate (after inflation). This interest is actually less than the historic average paid by Treasury Bonds in which the Social Security Trust is nominally invested.

A deal is a deal.   We paid for it, we are owed it, and the U.S. government is good for it.   To change the terms of the deal ex post facto is both a breach of contract and a violation of the Constitution.  

          Where to Get the Money: Ron Paul's Creative Plan

A sovereign nation can always find the money to pay debts owed in its own currency.   The U.S. could, if it wished, pay its bills using debt-free U.S. Notes or Greenbacks, just as President Lincoln did to avoid a crippling debt during the Civil War.   Alternatively, it could eliminate the deficit with Ron Paul's plan, which amounts to the same thing.   As Stephen Gandel explains Paul's solution in Time Magazine:   

"In the last year or two the Fed has been buying up U.S. Treasury bonds in an effort to lower interest rates and boost the economy. The most recent round of that buying has been dubbed QE2, and has come under a good deal of criticism, though most economists agree that it was a generally helpful policy. The result is that the Fed now holds nearly $1.7 trillion in U.S. debt. But that is really phony debt. The Treasury pays the interest on the debt on behalf of the U.S. government to the Fed, which in turn returns 90 percent of the payments it gets back to the Treasury. Nonetheless, that $1.7 trillion in U.S. bonds that the Fed owns, despite the shell game of payments, is still counted in the debt ceiling number, which caps that amount of total federal debt at $14.3 trillion.

"Paul's plan: Get the Fed and the Treasury to rip up that debt. It's fake debt anyway. And the Fed is legally allowed to return the debt to the Treasury to be destroyed. A trillion and a half dollars is currently about what spending is expected to exceed tax revenue in 2011."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 14   Well Said 9   News 5  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ellen Brown Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the best-selling WEB OF DEBT. In THE PUBLIC BANK SOLUTION, her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically and (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's the Derivatives, Stupid! Why Fannie, Freddie and AIG Had to Be Bailed Out

Mysterious Prison Buses in the Desert

LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Libya: All About Oil, or All About Central Banking?

Borrowing from Peter to Pay Paul: The Wall Street Ponzi Scheme Called Fractional Reserve Banking

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend