Kerry, Kerry pants on fire!: If You Believed the Secretary of State's Poison Gas Lie, You'll Love His Latest One

By Dave Lindorff

If the best the US can do to pin the blame for the Malaysia Flight 17 downing on Russia is to have Secretary of State John Kerry say that "circumstantial evidence" points to Moscow being behind it, we can be pretty certain it was not Russia at all.

Kerry's credibility on such matters has been in the toilet since last August when he claimed during last year's furor and push for war against Syria's Bashar al Assad that he had seen "clear and compelling evidence" that the Syrian government had used poison gas against its own people. That "evidence" turned out (clearly with Kerry's knowledge) to have been ginned up, falsified and staged, and in the end it was evident that Syria had not been the guilty party. Had Kerry and the White House succeeded in duping the world and the American people the way President George W. Bush and VP Dick Cheney succeeded in duping them about Iraq's "WMDs," an armada of US planes and ships already in position around Syria would have begun a massive aerial bombardment of Syria sparking a whole new war in the Middle East, even as Iraq was already in the throes of a civil war.

Fortunately, John Kerry's and the accommodating US corporate media's lies that time were exposed, and that bloody catastrophe was averted.

Now, undeterred by that first attempt at a full-blown campaign of lies, Kerry and the White House are at it again, trying to falsify a casus belli against Russia by blaming Moscow for the downing of a civilian airliner that killed 298 people.

The problem for Kerry and Washington's warmongers is that the story they're selling is ludicrous.

Why on earth would the Russians (who have been scrupulously avoiding getting involved in the Ukraine fighting), have provided the separatist rebels in Eastern Ukraine with Buk missiles capable of downing high-altitude planes? Such aircraft pose no threat to the rebels. What they fear is the Ukraine military's ground attack aircraft and bombers, and their helicopter gunships and troop transport planes. And they already have demonstrated that they've got the weapons to deal with those, in the form of shoulder-fired, wire-guided missiles -- weapons that don't have the capability to down aircraft flying at anywhere near 33,000 feet.

The answer to that question is that the Russia would gain nothing, and would stand to lose a lot by contributing to the downing of a civilian aircraft. In fact, we can see, in the desperate effort by Kerry to pin the blame on Russia, exactly whey they would never have wanted to do such a thing...

For the rest of this article by DAVE LINDORFF inThisCantBeHappening!, the new, uncompromising, four-time Project Censored Award-winning online alternative newspaper, please go to: www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/2380