Login | Register

142 online

OpEdNews Op Eds 3/13/2014 at 9:36 PM EDT H3'ed 3/13/14

Misdirected Mail: White House Budget Proposes Damaging Postal Service Cuts

By John Nichols (Page 1 of 2 pages) 3 comments

John Nichols

Become a Fan
(24 fans)

Source: The Nation

The U.S. Postal Service announced Wednesday that it will end regular Saturday delivery of mail delivery beginning in August.
(Image by Bloomberg) Details DMCA

Among the very worst ideas for "reforming" the United States Postal Service are proposals to end Saturday delivery and to shift from at-the-door delivery of mail to a scheme that would force Americans to go to collect letters and packages from central delivery spots.

Both approaches would diminish the scope and character of the postal service while increasing the likelihood that private firms will move in to fill the void.

These are the sort of ideas that are peddled by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chair Darrell Issa, R-California, and others who target the USPS for deep cuts. Unfortunately, they've turned up in the Obama administration's budget.

As The Hill reports:

"Obama's budget would allow USPS to scrap all Saturday delivery -- even packages, one of the most rapidly growing parts of the Postal Service's business. USPS in recent months has shown more interest in expanding when it delivers packages, with Sunday delivery now in limited areas.

"The White House budget would also allow USPS to move away from door-to-door delivery to more centralized delivery areas, an idea also panned by Democrats. Plus, USPS could keep a recent temporary increase in the price of stamps -- which large mailers loathe -- beyond the scheduled two years."

According to the Obama administration, these reforms -- along with a proposal to tinker with some of the immediate requirements for pre-funding retiree healthcare benefits 75 years into the future -- "would set USPS on a sustainable business path, providing it with over $20 billion in cash relief, operational savings and revenue through 2016."

Click Here to Read Whole Article

But that's not how the people who deliver the mail, and who have battled to preserve the postal service, see it.

American Postal Workers Union president Mark Dimondstein says the administration budget echoes "misguided policies...for severe cutbacks that will harm service, drive away business, and eliminate jobs."

"The budget fails to eliminate the pre-funding requirement of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, which is the fundamental cause of the Postal Service's manufactured financial crisis," says Dimondstein, who adds that "with the Postal Service posting operating profits in mail and package delivery, there is absolutely no justification to continue a strategy of austerity. Rather than damaging the infrastructure and network that is essential for providing service, the Postal Service must expand service."

That's a message that a new alliance of postal unions -- the APWU, the National Association of Letter Carriers, the National Postal Mail Handlers Union and the National Rural Letter Carriers Association -- wants to communicate with the president and his budget team. The unions offered this week to meet with the White House to discuss strategies for strengthening the postal service -- from changes in shipping rules to the development of a postal banking system along lines proposed by US Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts.

But the first reform has to involve a realistic restructuring of that requirement to prefund retiree health benefits decades into the future.

"Our Postal Service is in need of true reform, not ill-advised, counter-productive attempts to slash service," says National Rural Letter Carriers' Association president Jeanette Dwyer...

"By reworking the Postal Service's funding of its retiree health benefits, an obligation which accounts for 80 percent of USPS losses over recent years and is forced on no other public or private entity, lawmakers could take the easiest and most sensible step toward getting this venerable institution back on the right page. Allowing the Postal Service to continue to innovate with same-day parcel delivery and other services will provide a great opportunity to generate needed revenue and allow the USPS to remain a competitive player in the shipping and delivery industry. We need to grow our Postal Service not shrink it."

Instead of borrowing ideas from members of Congress who want to downsize and dismantle the postal service, White House aides would be well to take the counsel of members who recognize the immense potential of the postal service.

Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, and Congressman Peter DeFazio, D-Oregon, have introduced a smart fix, the Postal Service Protection Act, which has 174 co-sponsors in the House and 27 in the Senate.

Next Page 1 | 2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

1
Rate It | View Ratings

John Nichols Social Media Pages:

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written the Online Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about (more...)

Related Topic(s): Budget Deficit; Obama; Postal Service, Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Authors' Articles

OpEdNews ~~depends upon~~ can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Congress Switchboard: 202-224-3121

To remove advertising from OpEd News, please become a premium member.

"Rob Kall's Bottom Up is a revaluation of values, not the empty mouthing of the word 'democracy' that is so common, but the application of belief in popular wisdom to every aspect of life. Actually believing that the views of more people is better, means a new way of thinking about the world that is democratic, feminist, localist, populist, and radically richer than the elitist perspectives that are more common even in the parts of the world that shout the word 'democracy' the most. Here we come to understand both the power of small groups and the upsides to internet crowd sourcing, the potential of nonviolent movements and ways in which the past has not been what we supposed. Don't just read this book; get lots of people to read and talk about it."

David Swanson, host, Talk Nation Radio, author of War No More: The Case for Abolition.

Art Instruction for People
At All Skill Levels

Top Content
in the Last 2 Days
(by Page Views)

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

Ad info: click here

Classics of Liberal Thinking

Progressive Radio Links