61 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/31/10

Obama has a "Growing Vexation" with Hamid Karsai

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

President Obama made a secret, unannounced visit to Afghanistan over the weekend, met with the Afghan President Hamid Karsai and expressed his "growing vexation" with the man, particularly over "corruption". Can it be Obama is really "vexed" with Karsai? Was this truly unexpected of him? The idea is laughable!

Karsai is a product of our making and the machinations related to our invasion and occupation. He is a quisling, a puppet.

His rule, if you can call it that, extends no further than the limits of Kabul. He is not accepted as the legitimate head of Afghanistan by the overwhelming majority of the people in that country.

He IS corrupt, (certainly not unknown by Obama) while his brother, part of Karsai's inner ruling circle, is a known trafficker in the drug trade. Karsai's recent reelection was rifled with irregularities and vote fraud. He remains in office only as long as the U.S. presence remains. The absurdity is Obama wanting and expecting Karsai to be anything other than he is, corrupt to the core.

He is sure to be removed from office, overthrown in a coup, assassinated or executed or secretly hustled out of the country (once the U.S. departs) and any number of the multiple forces operating in the country will come forth and vie for power most probably in traditional Afghan fashion, in a violent takeover.

After the presidential "dressing down", Obama met with cheering troops saying, "Al Qaeda and their extremist allies are a threat to the people in Afghanistan and a threat to the people of America, but they're also a threat to people around the world."[1]

Apparently Mr. Obama didn't get the "memo" from his chief military advisor General Jim Jones (Ret) who said months ago that Afghanistan had less than 100 al Qaeda militants remaining in the country.

Was that not the primary justification for our invasion of Afghanistan in October, 2002; remove al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden from their asylum in the country and for perpetrating the attacks of 9/11?

But with the coming of Obama, the "goal line" has shifted, the war escalated and broadened,(not so clandestinely) into Pakistan, and making the Taliban (vanquished and overthrown in our invasion but now reconstituted, reenergized and determined to outlast us) our primary target (and one supposes because they, prior to 9/11 gave sanctuary and sustenance to Osama and al Qaeda).

The troops cheered Obama (as they do all presidents in their presence). Yet their mission can not be accomplished if defeating the indigenous Taliban and getting the Afghan people to side with us is that mission.

Only Afghans will be able to sort out their country's future. It can not be done with an American presence or any other foreign invader or occupier going all the way back to Alexander the Great, the British or the Soviets after them. It is why Afghanistan has been known as the "graveyard of empires".

It is only American hubris and arrogance that it alone believes can defy history's lessons.


[1] "In Afghan Trip, Obama Presses Karsai on Graft", by Alissa J. Rubin and Helene Cooper, "The New York Times", March 28, 2010.

Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend