Today, I just finished reading Mike Shedlock / Mish's article titled: "WHERE THE HELL IS THE OUTRAGE . If you haven't read it, I recommend it.
Mish was successful in pissing me off. I felt like a low level "mushroom employee, who is kept in the dark and fed bullshit. Goldman Sachs" Mish does an excellent job in portraying Goldman Sachs as a despicable company.
But then my mind wandered to 9/11. A September 2009 Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll found that 30% of Americans now believe that the US government assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, up from 15% in 2006.
Back when I did my analysis on 9/11 years ago, I must of used over 75 websites, digging here and digging there to finally conclude that yes, my government was instrumental in the 9/11 attacks. I was finally persuaded by the collapse of the 47 story building, since it fell at the speed of gravity, in what could only be viewed as a perfect demolition"
Today, the information that clearly proves that the 9/11 attack was done by the US can be found at one website: http://patriotsquestion911.com/ . This website has military officers, engineers, architects, aviation professionals, professors, 9/11 survivors, and media professionals.
The very first military officer interview is Major General Albert Stubblebine, who was responsible for all Army Military Intelligence. As you might imagine, this guy is an expert at looking at satellite photos for missiles, tanks, etc" The following is from the General's interview at the above website:
"Well, for one thing, if you look at the hole that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the walls of the Pentagon. I have been unable to find those wing marks. So where were they? Did this vessel -- vehicle, or whatever it was -- have wings? Apparently not, because if it had had wings, they would have made marks on the side of the Pentagon.
One person counteracted my theory, and said, "Oh, you've got it all wrong. And the reason that it's wrong is that as the airplane came across, one wing tipped down and hit the ground and broke off." I said, "Fine, that's possible, one wing could have broken off." But if I understand airplanes correctly, most airplanes have two wings. I haven't met an airplane with only one wing. So where was the mark for the second wing? OK, one broke off -- there should have been a mark for the second wing. I could not find that in any of the photographs that I've analyzed. Now I've been very careful to not say what went in there. Why? Because you don't have that evidence. "
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).