I.
The ordeal of Fatima Bouchar, detailed by Ian Cobain in the Guardian,
exemplifies the vile essence of the "Terror War" being conducted by
United States and its abject satellite, Great Britain, against large
swathes of the world's population (including, increasingly, their own
people). It is a case of brutal torture against an innocent, defenseless
pregnant woman, whose only "crime" was to be married to a man who
belonged to an organization which had long been supported by the US and
UK -- until the geopolitics of oil made the group expendable. It is a
tale of cowardice and cruelty, of hypocrisy and corruption, of
deliberate atrocity that exacerbates the extremism it purports to
combat. It is the emblem of an evil system ordered, countenanced,
championed and protected at the very highest levels of the two
governments -- a system that is very much still in operation today.
Bouchar
was married to Abdel Hakim Belhaj, a member of a group seeking to
overthrow Moamar Gadafy in Libya. For 10 years, members of the group had
been given asylum in Britain and other countries. According to credible
reports, they were being supported by British intelligence in their
efforts to oust the Libyan dictator. Then Gadafy began negotiating his
deal with George W. Bush and Tony Blair to open up Libyan oil fields to
the West. Suddenly, his enemies became enemies of the West; as in
Afghanistan, stalwart "freedom fighters" were transformed into
"terrorists" overnight, when the agenda of the West's corporate
overlords demanded it. (The same process would be reversed in 2011,
after Gadafy had proved less servile than expected.)
At that
point, Bouchar and her husband suddenly became bargaining chips in the
backroom deal being greased in Washington, London and Tripoli. As proved
by secret files and messages unearthed in Libya after Gadafy's fall,
Bouchar and Belhaj were offered to Gadafy as a gift from the British, a
sweetener to pave the way for his first meeting with Tony Blair -- and
for the oil deals that swiftly followed.
"Just when Fatima Bouchar thought it couldn't get any worse, the Americans forced her to lie on a stretcher and began wrapping tape around her feet. They moved upwards, she says, along her legs, winding the tape around and around, binding her to the stretcher. They taped her stomach, her arms and then her chest. She was bound tight, unable to move.
"Bouchar says there were three Americans: two tall, thin men and an equally tall woman. Mostly they were silent. She never saw their faces: they dressed in black and always wore black balaclavas. Bouchar was terrified. They didn't stop at her chest -- she says they also wound the tape around her head, covering her eyes. Then they put a hood and earmuffs on her. She was unable to move, to hear or to see. "My left eye was closed when the tape was applied," she says, speaking about her ordeal for the first time. "But my right eye was open, and it stayed open throughout the journey. It was agony." The journey would last around 17 hours. ...
"Belhaj says he was blindfolded, hooded, forced to wear ear defenders, and hung from hooks in his cell wall for what seemed to be hours. He says he was severely beaten. The ear defenders were removed only for him to be blasted with loud music, he says, or when he was interrogated by his US captors.
"Bouchar says that when she was dragged away from her husband she feared he was going to be killed. 'I thought: 'This is it.' I thought I would never see my husband again ... They took me into a cell, and they chained my left wrist to the wall and both my ankles to the floor. I could sit down but I couldn't move. There was a camera in the room, and every time I tried to move they rushed in. But there was no real communication. I wasn't questioned.' Bouchar found it difficult to comprehend how she could be treated in this way: she was four-and-a-half months pregnant. 'They knew I was pregnant,' she says. 'It was obvious.' She says she was given water while chained up, but no food whatsoever. She was chained to the wall for five days. At the end of this period she was taped to the stretcher and put aboard the aircraft, unaware of where she was going or whether her husband was on board. At one point the aircraft landed, remained on the ground for a short period and then took off again. Only when it landed a second time did she hear a man grunting with pain, and realize her husband was nearby. ...
"Two weeks after the couple were rendered to Libya, Tony Blair paid his first visit to the country, embracing Gaddafi and declaring that Libya had recognised 'a common cause, with us, in the fight against al-Qaida extremism and terrorism.' At the same time, in London, the Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell announced that it had signed a -110 million deal for gas exploration rights off the Libyan coast. ..."
As we noted here recently, these torture-renditions are by no means at an end. They thrive under the leadership of Barack Obama and David Cameron just as vigorously as they did under Bush and Blair. As Bill Blum put it last week:
"Shortly after Obama's inauguration, both he and Leon Panetta, the new Director of the CIA, explicitly stated that 'rendition' was not being ended. As the Los Angeles Times reported: 'Under executive orders issued by Obama recently, the CIA still has authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States.' ...
"After Panetta was questioned by a Senate panel, the New York Times wrote that he had 'left open the possibility that the agency could seek permission to use interrogation methods more aggressive than the limited menu that President Obama authorized under new rules ... Mr. Panetta also said the agency would continue the Bush administration practice of 'rendition' -- picking terrorism suspects off the street and sending them to a third country."
Here, at least, is a promise that Obama has kept.
II.
But
why do these tortures go on? (As noted in that previous post, Obama has
in no way "ended torture" by American officials; even the official
guidelines he has openly approved allow techniques that are torture
in every sense of the word.) What is the point of these atrocities? In
the vast majority of cases, "terrorist suspects" are the smallest of
small fry, even in the eyes of their captors; they are tortured merely
to extract some crumb of information from them, some tidbit that might
somehow fit into the "mosaic" -- the conceptual tool used by our intelligence services to weave gigantic, world-threatening conspiracies
which can only be thwarted by ever more vast expenditures and arbitrary
power for our intelligence services. As is well known, this
interrogation strategy produces mountains of useless crap, which our
intelligence "experts" then mold into whatever shape our politicians
(and their paymasters) require. It is worse than useless; it is
demonstrably counterproductive. It does not enhance "national security."
It doesn't even do anything in particular to advance the agendas of our
corporate and political overlords, because it throws up too much dust
and chaos to be of practical use in plotting their future moves.
So
why does it happen? Why are innocent pregnant women wrapped in tape,
why are children abducted, why are innocent people strung up in "stress
positions," why are captives beaten, bombarded with brain-scrambling
noise, stripped naked and sexually humiliated, drugged, deprived of
sleep, threatened with murder -- and sometimes murdered in fact? Why is
this being done by official representatives of the governments of the
United States and the United Kingdom?
Why? Because -- and let us be absolutely clear about this -- because these people want to torture others.
They like it, they enjoy it. There is clearly a zest, a psycho-sexual
rush at work. Like child abusers, they enjoy their full, unchallengeable
physical power over the bodies of their defenseless victims. They get
off on it. They are the moral equivalent of pedophiles, and in any
remotely healthy society, they would be treated as such.
And of
course we are not talking solely of those doing the hands-on torture.
Their bosses are of exactly the same ilk. I refer here to our great and
good, our high and mighty, the minsters of state, the cabinet members,
the military chieftains, the lords and legislators, the prime ministers,
the presidents. All of them are eager participants in this extreme
perversity. They love the fact that they can order human beings to be
tortured -- to be beaten, trussed up, stripped and probed, drugged,
driven crazy. They love how tough it makes them feel. They love how
powerful it makes them feel. There should be no mistake about this.
Torture is being carried out because our leaders want it to be, because
they like it. There are no reluctant torturers -- neither at highest
levels nor among the factotums actually doing the deed.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).