Snowden is Not My Name
Alen J. Salerian, MD
Snowden is not my name yet I am
thankful for the courage and integrity of the British Parliament not to
authorize a knee-jerk military response to a highly uncertain yet for sure
grotesque human suffering in
My concerns are twofold: first I'm
not sure whether we have sufficient evidence to identify the source of the
atrocities. How can we be sure that a subgroup of bad guys is not involved
in inducing atrocities to trigger a military intervention. In an
extraordinarily complex military social political environment inherent with
ancient conflicts what would be more natural than making your adversaries look
like mass killers? Furthermore how would short of a direct military
intervention, we shall find solutions for chronic and complex political
problem by fireworks? For sure we may experience a transient euphoria
associated with a false sense of accomplishment of revenge and justice. But
does this mean the fireworks are either rational or helpful?
I have another concern which is my
primary source of respect for Snowden and the British Parliament: defending
institutional integrity. Let me explain. Our government has not always been
truthful when it comes to war. Before the second world war we claimed we did
not know that Japanese were going to attack
After 9/11 our government claimed we
were surprised that a dozen of young men would fly airplanes to attack the twin
towers. What we know today does not match the original governmental claims. We
also said we don't know how and why three sky scrapers collapsed imitating the
precise features of buildings demolished by man-made engineering. What's
obvious about 9/11 is the simple truth that there are plenty and well contained
secrets our government is unwilling to share with us. Yet, we took our
government's word to send our young men to