(Article changed on April 13, 2013 at 13:36)
(Article changed on April 13, 2013 at 13:30)
.Yrolg Dlo. by Marta Steele
.Yrolg Dlo. by Marta Steele
.Yrolg Dlo. by Marta Steele
"All the attention, so far, has gone to the Social
Security change. Obama has been offering this deal to Republican leaders for
ages. . . . they [the GOP] walked out expressing amazement that he was open to
such a thing"--Gail Collins, New York Times ,
13 April 2013
I
thought I was hallucinating when it was announced that our president had put
our social security earnings on the table, the "chained cpi," in his budget discussions with
the GOP. Was he taking his clue from the bank account skimming in Cyprus? No,
perhaps they took their clue from him, chronologically. Our president also
skimmed 10 percent off of his salary, as a gesture. Perhaps those saved funds
can be added back to our social security stash?
He did snicker with McCain, I believe, that
neither was on welfare during their first debate, didn't he? He certainly
snickered with someone who had written a book with a huge up-front and New York
Times-bestseller status for weeks. Dreams from his father?
For the GOP to walk out in amazement that
our president, as Collins reported, so betrayed his constituency may make
history. It's as if our president walked out on them for taking social security
off the table, which they just might have done. Or walked out on them for
raising taxes on the rich of their own free will. Did they just walk out when
the dinner was over, or abandon their entrees, Ms. Collins?
Oh, wow, will shockers never cease? And
since when are our new extremists so holier than our president?
Next point: social security is an
insurance policy we've paid for all of our working lives. It's not the charity
the GOP treats it as. It doesn't come out of their oversized wallets. They
collect it too. It's been proposed that all those billionaires refuse it. If
so, the rest of us ragtag rabble would not have to worry or storm Washington en
masse. And that would be a huge crowd, believe me, and not just doddering
seniors.
But
another suggestion by Ms. Collins is a bit off: "I'd trade a dramatic new
commitment to funding quality early childhood education for a change in the way
cost-of-living increases are computed for Social Security, as long as the
oldest and neediest of the recipients are protected."
What's
the cut-off age, Ms. Collins? The expanding cadre of centenarians--now so
increased that they no longer earn a small square on front pages?
Our promising kiddies will someday get
old, too. Statistics suggest they won't live as long as this burden on society
we are, and education is hideously, frightfully neglected and way past "at risk,"
but why take money from us beautifully educated elders, banned from the
workplace not only because we have this extra income but because we may be
talking over the heads of our posterity, not to mention suffering from other
forms of ageism?
Young
people are prettier, let's face it, especially when they can write a
grammatical sentence. And, let's face it again, soon maybe posterity won't know
how to, or even know that they don't.
Let's lift some sanctions off of food sent
to North Koreans--they're already half a head shorter, on average, then their
cousins south of the barbed-wire border.
And
let's lift some other sanctions from our own youth, who cannot afford higher
education anymore--will our president put Pell grants onto the bargaining table
next? Let's throw out some of those nukes sprawling over thousands of acres
somewhere in the Midwest and plant food there, if it won't be radioactive.
Let's cut the defense budget even more.
Now that we're living longer, let the
government, instead of lowering our soc sec securities, start a hire-a-senior
program, so that we won't be such a drain on society. Seems like, when we're
forced back to work because of drained portfolios and pensions, we're more
often sweeping floors than sitting in offices with windows. I'd take one
without windows.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).