Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Money Debate

      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It


Author 30599
- Advertisement -

In the aftermath of the smackdown between Jon Stewart and Jim Cramer, a lot of valid points have been made about the larger implications of the debate. Two of Stewart's criticisms of Cramer,  "It's not about you," and, "It's not a game," are particularly important.  Stewart's point was that there are real life implications when the "players"- screw over the rest of us, and that Cramer is a poster child for the amoral manipulators of money who deliberately game the system for personal profit. Cramer is a particularly good candidate since his posturing as a helpful advocate for public understanding of the markets is coincident with his well-documented contempt for playing by the rules.  Ironically, his example is useful in confirming the public suspicion that the Bernie Madoffs, the Enron thieves, the short-sellers who drive down values by selling stocks they don't even own, and the high-priced brain trust of corporate America that creates financial "instruments"- which are designed to obscure accountability, are more the rule than the exception.

We would do well to remember that ownership, and the economic structure that grows from it, is an intellectual construction, not a natural reality.  The land I "own" is not mine as some sort of divine endowment; it's "mine"- because I live in a society that has agreed to a lot of complex conventions that allow me to claim title to it.  I trust others to honor the contract, and they trust me to do the same. Trust was the moral dimension of economics that allowed our fathers to do a lot of business based "on a handshake."  Today, the structure looks somewhat the same, but the trust is gone, and the regulation and monitoring that will have to replace it are not there.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


I am a retired boatbuilder with a fascination for political thought. Most of my life I cheerfully described myself as an "eastern establishment, knee jerk, liberal Democrat."

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Capitalism and Health Care

Corporate America's Secret Weapon: Socialism

The Occupation is the Message

Follow the Money

A Case Study: Dawn E. Johnsen

A Pol Meets a Senator


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
You wrote that America "creates financial ... by Ludwik Kowalski on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:47:06 AM
Thanks for your comment. I protest that you misqu... by Donald de Fano on Sunday, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:44:06 PM