50 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/16/09

The Secret Democratic healthcare filibuster

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Message Brent Budowsky
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

The Democrats need 60 votes to end filibusters. The Democrats control 60 Senate seats. Democratic leaders do not yet have 60 votes to end filibusters on healthcare and other issues.

Sherlock Holmes to Watson: If they need 60 votes, and they control 60 seats, why don't they have 60 votes? The answer, my dear Watson, is that there is secret Democratic support for the filibuster, from one or more Democratic senators who are not being publicly identified but who are being used to try to defeat the strongest healthcare reform.


I have no sympathy for the Party of No, the Republicans who use obstructionist tactics to protect the status quo and destroy the hope for change. But I have no more sympathy for any Senate Democrats, who are small in number but destructive in impact, who join the Party of No in obstruction, with nobody knowing.

The Senate has become dysfunctional. We have reached the point where a minority can obstruct virtually anything in the Senate, and usually does. Even worse, we have reached the point where certain senators don't even have to acknowledge their obstruction; they filibuster in secret by whispering in the ears of Senate leaders, without their constituents or the nation being informed.

The public option is supported by a majority of the House, a majority of the Senate, supposedly the president and huge majorities of the people that in most polls reach 65 percent.

And yet, not only does the minority obstruct the majority, but there are now secret obstructionists, done through private whispers unknown to voters, who seek to kill change by threatening to support filibusters they hope they will never be accountable for in public. This is absurd.

1. It is time to change the Senate rules and lower the number of votes that would end these obstructionist tactics from 60 to 55.

2. I am working to develop another reform that would involve some procedure to require senators to issue a formal "intent to filibuster or consider a filibuster" that would be public information prior to the filibuster debate even being considered.

I would urge party leaders to begin to publicly announce when any senator has told them that he or she might filibuster. We have to end the fiction that "we don't have the votes" when the public should have a right to know, on issues important to the nation, exactly who is trying to kill major change.

Meanwhile, let's pass the public option, and let's end the antitrust exemption for insurers so price-fixing and collusion would be illegal for them, and let's end this practice of secret filibusters that has taken a ludicrous and intolerable situation in the Senate and made it even worse.

Voters elected Democrats to 60 seats along with a Democratic president and strongly Democratic House. Enough is enough. If there are Democrats who want to defeat change in favor of special interests, they should do publicly, and be accountable to those who elected them.

Reprinted from thehill.com
Rate It | View Ratings

Brent Budowsky Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Brent Budowsky is a regular columnist on thehill.com. He served as Legislative Assistant to U.S. Senator Lloyd Bentsen, responsible for commerce and intelligence matters, including one of the core drafters of the CIA Identities Law. Served (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Bank Robbery of 2009

Republicans propose another recession

BP bailout proposal coming soon

A Bernie Sanders Shocker Is Coming

Manafort pardon would be impeachable, indictable and convictable

Obstruction of justice bombshell will explode before midterms

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend