35 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 31 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 5/2/13

The Syria-Iran Red Line Show

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (190 fans)
Source: Asia Times

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

This eminently Bushist Obama "red line" business, applied to Syria, Iran or both, is becoming a tad ridiculous. 

Take Pentagon head Chuck Hagel's tour of Israel and the "friendly" GCC (the de facto Gulf Counter-revolution Club) last week. US defense contractors had the Moet flowing as Hagel merrily congregated with that prodigy of democracy -- United Arab Emirates (UAE) Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed -- to celebrate the sale of 25 F-16 fighter jets. 

There's more on the way; 48 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD missile interceptors, at a cool US$1 billion. The  Pentagon is sending one of its only two of such systems to Guam this month to counter that other threat -- missiles from North Korea.  

The weaponizing free fest to Israel and the Gulf petro-monarchies -- missile defense, fighter jets, mega-bombs -- could not but be duly hailed as the proverbial "message" to "counter Iran's nuclear ambitions," or "the air and missile threat posed by Iran," or the general "worry about Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapon" or "Washington's determination to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons." 

There's no "red line" here; just hardcore weaponizing of Israel and the GCC. Any doubts, blame it on Iran. And this while Saudi-controlled media in the Middle East -- roughly everything except al-Jazeera -- was breathlessly spinning that Tel Aviv is pursuing a deal to use Turkish soil for an attack on Iran. 

Wait; there's more weaponizing on the way -- bound to neighboring latitudes. Kraus-Maffei Wegmann (KMW) from Germany closed another $2.48 billion deal with Qatar -- five years in the making -- to deliver 62 Leopard 2 tanks and 24 self-propelled howitzers. Qatar is not exactly using them for the 2022 FIFA World Cup; they are bound to "friendly groups in other countries" -- as in Syria's "rebels," via Turkey. 

Ask the Nenets
 

Now take the Syria chemical weapons charade. The White House now seems to be convinced that the CIA believes, with "varying degrees of confidence," that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons. Secretary of State John Kerry -- an "intervention" cheerleader posing as a dove -- was already convinced. 

But then Hagel said, "Suspicions are one thing; evidence is another." Just to flip-flop a little while later, during his visit to Israel, he became convinced Bashar al-Assad was using sarin gas. Of course; after all, Hagel finally had unimpeded access to Israeli -- not US -- intel. 

And now for the beauty of Hagel's marketing; what about embarking as a traveling salesman to "our bastards" with a sales pitch of "Look, Iran and Syria are both crazy, you might consider stacking up on this, this and this." 

The Nenets of Siberia -- crossing the Ob river to enter the Arctic Circle -- could teach a thing or two about real strategy to those limping armchair warriors in US Think Tankland. Even the Nenets would know that the current chemical weapons hysteria is a total fabrication by the CIA, MI6 and Israeli intelligence -- corroborated by zero evidence. Still, the prevailing Washington "wisdom" is that a "red line" must be enforced over Syria so a "red line" must be enforced on Iran. 

The fact is that the al-Assad government initially accused the "rebels" of using chemical weapons -- and asked the United Nations for an official investigation. 

Even the New York Times was forced, grudgingly, to admit the "rebels" acknowledged an attack happened in territory controlled by the government, with 16 Syrian Army dead, plus 10 civilians and over a hundred injured. But then the "rebels" changed the narrative, blaming Damascus of bombing their own soldiers. It was Moscow that introduced a measure of reality, detailing how Washington was stalling the UN investigation. 

Our Nenets of Siberia would also know there's hardly anything secular leading the "rebels" in Syria; it's a motley crew of varying degrees of fanaticism. Once again, the Nenets would not need to freeze to death reading the New York Times to find out that the CIA is "secretly" funneling a free for all weaponizing to the "rebels" via Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Still the Obama administration peddles the fiction that Washington only supplies "non lethal" aid as Capitol Hill nutters keep insisting that Obama install a "no fly zone" over Syria -- as in Libya-style NATO war remix. 

Follow-on strike package, anyone?
 

US Think Tankland nonetheless is ecstatic that the GCC petro-monarchies now have access to precision-guided munitions to "strike Iranian targets". 

But nothing compares to the cheerleading of Israel's new access to KC-135 aerial refueling tankers -- or Stratotankers. Then there's the imminent transfer of anti-radiation missiles as well -- advanced versions of the AGM-88 HARM missiles. These toys will "reduce the threat to Israel's follow-on strike package." 

No, this is not exactly about "US circumspection," or "US resolve in the campaign against Iranian nuclear weapons"; it's unqualified Dog of War barking. 

Meanwhile, that police state run by King Playstation, also known as Jordan, has opened its airspace to Israeli drones now engaged in "monitoring" Syria. 

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 2   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend