39 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Third Constitution of the United States--Latest Revision, September 7, 2012

By       (Page 1 of 12 pages)   7 comments
Message Roger Copple
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

 

 Third Constitution of the United States

Latest Revision, September 7, 2012

 

    Preamble

We the People of the United States establish this Third Constitution of the United States of North America to promote human rights, social justice, ecological wisdom, democracy, and peace and happiness for the citizens of our country and ultimately to all citizens of the world.   (The first US government was under the Articles of Confederation.   The second was implemented with the presidency of George Washington in 1789, and this is the third.)

 

   An Overview of the Third Constitution of the United States

Under this Third Constitution of the United States, there will be 435 federal legislators (the same number that was in the House of Representatives under the previous government), based on districts (including Washington D.C.) of equal population.   The election of members of the House of Representatives will be based on the system of Proportional Representation.  

Here is how Proportional Representation can work hypothetically: Voters in federal legislative districts will study and evaluate the platforms and constitutions of the 7 largest national political parties.   Each voter will choose one of 7 political parties that he or she most identifies with.     Let us say that based on the latest election, the new federal legislature will be 20% Republican, 20% Democratic, 15% Libertarian, 15% Constitution Party, 15% Green Party, 8% Socialist, and 7% Communist.  

The United States Senate, which existed under the former government, has been eliminated, which means the new one-house legislature will have 100 fewer federal legislators; it will thus be a legislature that is unicameral, not bicameral.   All federal legislation, in the one-chambered Congress, must be passed with a 51% majority.

  This Third Constitution is far more democratic than the previous constitution, and it is much shorter and easier to understand.   It takes all money out of politics, it reduces Supreme Court terms of office to 9 years, and allows Congress, not the president, to pick Supreme Court judges, using the method of Instant Runoff Voting.   This Third Constitution also eliminates the previous Electoral College System for electing a president of the United States, choosing instead to elect the presidential candidate who gets at least a 51% majority using the method of Instant Runoff Voting.   The Third Constitution promotes honesty and transparency at all levels of government.   Average Americans will now feel empowered to engage in political thinking on a daily basis.   Citizenship will be supremely valued, as never before.   This constitution can and should be studied by elementary students.  

Here is how Instant Runoff Voting can occur:   Let us say there are 7 candidates in a race, candidates Anthony, Bertha, Connie, Dawn, Ernie, Frank, and Gertrude.   Each voter will rank their top 3 choices from most favorite to least favorite.   In the final round of counting, one of the 7 candidates must get at least 51% of the vote to win.   At the first count of all the voters' first choices, Anthony got 30%, Bertha 30%, Connie 20%, Dawn 10%, Ernie 5%, Frank 3%, and Gertrude 2%.  

The last 4 candidates above cannot possibly win and are eliminated.   But the voters who chose the last 4 persons as their first choices will get to have either their second or third choices counted as their newly designated first choices before the second round of counting begins.   If their second choice was also eliminated as a result of the first count, then their third choice can count as a first choice vote.  

At the end of the second round of voting, 38% of the voters chose Anthony as their first choice, 37% chose Bertha, and 25% chose Connie.   But when the second choices (or third choices) of the voters who chose Connie as their first choice were redistributed among the top two contenders, it turns out that after the third count, Bertha got a majority of 52% of the votes, compared to Anthony's 48%.   So Bertha is the winner.   However, in another scenario, if 51% of the voters (which is a majority) had originally chosen Connie as their first choice, no further rounds of counting would be necessary.  

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Roger Copple Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

February 11, 2023 I grew up in a church that said you had to speak in tongues to get saved and go to heaven. I often prayed fervently starting at the age of 5 for the experience in the prayer room at church, where people would cry and wail, (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is COVID-19 a Biological Warfare Weapon?

Integrating Karl Marx and Abraham Maslow

Veganism: Why Doctors Don't Recommend It

The Earth Constitution Is Not Similar to Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum

Extinction Rebellion--Arguments For and Against

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend