When you go to protest they hide behind the immunity or just doing their job in official title and the question of jurisdiction comes into play. In our present court system with these issues, the games really began.
With the understanding some don't have fast computers and listening to the radio calls is a long process.
Or those not ably to be around for the call times there are those of us working the issue of putting the calls to text. For those who can listen to the calls they can be accessed on the following links.
Private Attorney General
http://privateattorneygeneral.ning.com/page/calls-1
Aib Radio
R: When I first did this, I had someone working with me to help me do it out. Nobody in this country has ever done this. This is technically the first for us to come out and do this, when we did in 2007. The one we had in 2002, we turned it back in to Judiciary Committee in 2007, on the House and Senate side. The one we did in 2008, Marie and I did it while we were in DC. If you even go through laws and go through their paperwork, you have typos all through their paperwork too.
With what we are doing, when we first started this, it was basically a bet that it could not be done. I did it.
The second one was the fact that we actually went into the Judiciary Committee on the House and Senate side and talked with them. We explained the crux of the matter; we laid it out for them. We handed them the documentation, back in 2007. They sat on it and really did not do anything. Then they came out with House Rule 660 where they went back in and tried to give themselves immunity for what they are doing.
What we are dealing with here is that we have the lawyers that are in control of so much of this stuff. It is like I am bringing out in the paperwork what I brought out last night on AIB radio. If you really, truly, get into the Constitution, under Article 1, Section 6, it talks about the House of Representatives, the Congressmen. They are immune from the rest except if they commit a felony, if they are taking bribes, or an act of treason. The moment they get paid off by a lobbyist that is a bribe, and a felony that's an act of treason because now they are working against the people.
If you get into Article 2, Section 4, it talks about the President, Vice-President, and civil officers. They cannot commit crimes and it lists them. In Article 3, Section 1, it talks about these judges being on good behavior. If you start looking at all of this, and these judges are claiming immunity --- no, you do not have immunity because of Title 18, under Civil Rights Violation, Obstruction of Justice - there are penalties for these people when they do that. In Title 42, is the section on how we will go back and bust them on it.
Where they are getting their immunity, where they are abusing it, is whenever the Bar Association created the Administrative Procedure Act, 1946, under Senate Bill 7, 60 stat. 237. What this was originally designed for - and we talked about this several months ago when we got into the Administrative Procedures stuff - when they created the Administrative Procedures Act, it had one function, supposedly.
That function was to be able to address administrative abuse, whether it was with Child Services, Dept. of Motor Vehicles, IRS, Dept of Justice, FBI; it did not make a bit of difference. It was an administrative setup that the people were supposed to be able to go into, pull an administrative hearing, talk to the arbitrator who was the Administrative Judge, lay out the evidence of the corruption and wrongdoing.
The other side was supposed to come as the defendant, never as the plaintiff. You would put forth your evidence, show where the errors are, show where the abuse is, and then the Administrative Judge was to say: "Okay, you are right; you are showing the evidence; you are showing the proof of the abuse.
On our side, we now have to change our policy because we are showing errors and abuse on our side. This is where the Administrative Judge was supposed to have the immunity that he could go to Child Services, IRS, the DOJ, FBI whatever department was involved--and say that the people proved their case. Here are the laws, the statutes, and Supreme Court case rulings.
You have to change your policy. This judge was supposed to be absolutely immune from any type of persecution or retaliation from the agencies. This is where they had their absolute, total immunity. It was from them, it was never supposed to be applied to our side as they are doing it now.
This goes right back to misuse and abuse of when they created this. They created policies, knowing that they were able to go back in and misuse them and that the people would never know the difference. The people would never figure it out. They would drop hints and the people would never be able to pick up the hints that were dropped. Through the years of policy abuses, and that we have worked on, and that people have gathered information on and shared, this is how we are starting to piece all of this together. We are starting to work together and share what we have. (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
1
