There wasn't anything particularly new in the scientists' revelations other than the fact that the magazine PC World covered the issue and several other mainstream news organizations.
Arguably, any mainstream coverage these days of election fraud, a topic of such national significance that it literally affects anyone who has ever cast a ballot, can be credited to a handful of hard core voting rights activists and muckraking citizen journalists who have made it their life's mission to overhaul the way people vote and restore much needed integrity to the process.
The scientists' warnings that this year's historic presidential election can be tinkered with came on the heels of the publication of a groundbreaking new book, "Loser Take All," click here a collection of eye-opening investigative reports into past issues of election fraud authored by voting rights experts, activists, and journalists, who used old-fashioned gumshoe reporting to expose the seedy side of the business of counting votes.
Perhaps no one has been passionate about this issue or has worked as hard to attract mainstream attention to the cause than bestselling author Mark Crispin Miller and blogger Brad Friedman, who co-authored an essay for the book with voting rights advocate Michael Richardson.
Well before anyone understood what election fraud meant, Miller, also a professor at New York University, and Friedman, whose BradBlog website is the go-to place on the Internet for comprehensive coverage on voting issues, were sounding early warning alarms and educating the public about voting machines plagued with software bugs, the ease at which hackers can bust into the system and change the vote count for candidates, such as George W. Bush, and place him ahead of Democratic challenger John Kerry in states such as Ohio.
Miller, who wrote extensively in his book “Fooled Again” click here about the theft of countless votes cast during the 2004 presidential election--in Ohio and many other states-- were stolen from Kerry and handed to Bush, said in an interview that the 2008 election can be stolen "through pre-emption of innumerable votes, as well as through the use of e-voting machines, both paperless touch-screen machines and op-scans."
“It's safe to say that the entire federal government, insofar as it's controlled by BushCo's appointees, has been diligently working to suppress all but those votes that will support the [Republican] party,” Miller said. “The [Veterans Administration], for example, has announced that it will not help badly injured veterans register to vote since those who've been thus damaged by Bush/Cheney's war aren't likely to be big McCain supporters.”
“On top of all this, there is, of course, the fact that somewhere between 85 and 90 percent of the electorate will either cast its votes on, or have its votes counted by, computerized e-voting machinery that was manufactured, and that is being serviced, by private companies with close ties to the GOP,” Miller added. Warren O’Dell, the former chief executive of Diebold, the top manufacturer of electronic voting machines, famously declared in August 2003 that his company was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president [Bush] next year."
O’Dell’s promise became prophetic. Not only did Ohio “deliver” electoral votes for Bush in 2004, the votes were delivered to Bush illegitimately, which Bob Fitrakis documents heroically in the chapter, “As Ohio Goes...” Fitrakis has repeatedly documented the rip-off in Ohio in several books, and was instrumental in assisting the House Judiciary Committee’s probe of what took place in Ohio during the 2004 presidential election.
Miller said as long as the GOP makes the 2008 presidential campaign “look "close" enough--and, with a media system like ours, "close" can be as much as eight percentage points or even more--they're in a very good position to steal it...again.”
“All that they really need is a convincing rationale for the surprising victory of John McCain; and that rationale has been set up already--"America's not ready to vote for a black man" or "for a woman," and/or "for that woman", and, as well, "It was that long, fierce civil war within the Democratic Party," a "civil war" fomented by the GOP itself, through their manipulation of the e-voting machines used in many primaries, and the mass cross-over vote by thousands of Republicans,” he said.
Sadly, while these events in “Loser Take All” are supported by a mountain of documents, there are many, including some of the more prominent players in the progressive movement, who dismiss these findings and disregard calls to action because they believe, wrongly, that it may cast them as some sort of left-wing loon. Indeed, publications such as Salon, Mother Jones, The Nation, and TomPaine.com, have virtually ignored this hot-button issue or have written about it in such a way as to dismiss it as conspiracy theory. Editors at those publications did not return emails or phone calls seeking comment.
However, progressive news organizations such as Online Journal, BuzzFlash, AlterNet, CommonDreams, OpEd News, have been covering the issue since 2002 and are largely responsible for disseminating much of the information that appears in “Loser Take All.”
Miller attributed such ignorance by the progressive elite to a “toxic combination of denial and careerism.”
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
