Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org and VoteTrustUSA.Org
The news has been full of ES&S having problems delivering optical-scan machines and now Diebold seems to have a problem delivering promised DREs to customers in Ohio. For the third time, the New York Times has editorialized in favor of optical-scan voting. In Alaska Diebold is doing all they can to cover-up the failures of their machines in 2004 by not allowing the state to release some files. Maryland's SoS is finally showing 'great concern' about the Diebold machines she has been touting for years....
NAtional: "Hacking" and the Paper Ballot-Optical Scan Voting System LINK
AK: State Refuses to Release Public Records LINK
AK: Diebold Blocks Alaska Voters From Viewing Election 2004 Results, Data! LINK
AK: State rebuffs raw vote demand LINK
AK: State Claims Diebold Data is Proprietary LINK
AR: Clark County - Quorum court paves way for purchase of voting machines LINK
CA: Humboldt County - Secretary of State visits county LINK
CA: Humboldt County - Secretary of state visits North Coast LINK
CA: San Mateo County - Supes To Vote On All-Mail Election Resolution LINK
CA: Yolo County - Yolo rejects electronic voting machines LINK
CT: Susan Bysiewicz - Starting Over On Voting-Machine Bids LINK
CT: Middletown - Forced re-vote for council seats in Middletown LINK
IN: Lake County - Voting changes explained LINK
MD: In Response to Florida Diebold Hack, Lamone Expresses 'Great Concern' about Threat to Maryland LINK Next Page 1 | 2
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
