Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org
The EAC seems to be hiding a lot with regard to their not giving interim accreditation to Ciber for testing voting systems. One commissioner says there is no report that led to the lack of accreditation by the EAC. Part of that interim accreditation is an inspection of the labs facilities and procedures. An advisor hired by the EAC did that inspection. How can there not be a report? Maybe it's not the final report. Maybe it's an interim report. No matter what it is called there must be a report. The government does not run without reams of paper. Why is the EAC obfuscating? What are they not telling us and why?...
NAtional: Testing Lab Failure Leads To Obfuscation By The Election Assistance Commission LINK
NAtional: Experts say changes in e-voting likely to come LINK
CA: State officials say testing proved machines accurate LINK
FL: Voting system tester barred LINK
FL: FL-13 - House Democrats continue challenge of Florida congressman's legitimacy LINK
FL: FL-13 - Dem objects to state ruling on District 13: Letter expresses concern... LINK
FL: FL-13 - House committee unlikely to rush District 13 voting inquiry LINK
FL: Sarasota County - Bennett proposes 'no vote' option LINK
MS: Lafayette County could become early voting pilot project LINK
OH: Butler County - Absentee voting strains board LINK
**"Daily Voting News" is meant as a comprehensive listing of reports each day concerning issues related to election and voting news around the country regardless of quality or political slant. Therefore, items listed in "Daily Voting News" may not reflect the opinions of VotersUnite.Org or OpEdNews.Com**