42 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

The Gun is Smoking: 2004 Ohio Precinct Level Exit Poll Data Show Irrefutable Evidence of Vote Miscount

By Kathy Dopp  Posted by Joan Brunwasser (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
Media Release: January 16, 2005 by the National Election Data Archive

The Gun is Smoking - 2004 Ohio Precinct-Level Exit Poll Data Show Virtually
Irrefutable Evidence of Vote Miscount
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/1/prweb333209.php

There is significant controversy about whether the 2004 presidential
election was conducted fairly and its votes counted correctly.
According to results of the major national election exit poll conducted for
the National Election Pool by Edison/Mitofsky (E/M), Kerry won Ohio's
pivotal vote, though the official tally gave the state, and thus the
presidency, to Bush. The conduct of Ohio's election was formally debated by
Congress in January 2005.

The National Election Data Archive (NEDA) is the first mathematical team to
release a valid scientific analysis of the precinct-level 2004 Ohio
presidential exit poll data "The Gun is Smoking: 2004 Ohio Precinct-Level
Exit Poll Data Show Virtually Irrefutable Evidence of Vote Miscount"
available at
http://electionarchive.org/ucvanalysis/oh/ohio-exit-polls-2004.pdf.
NEDA's analysis provides significant evidence of an outcome-altering vote
miscount.

The analysis is based on the most accurate statistical method yet devised
for determining whether exit poll error, random variations, or vote count
manipulation cause the discrepancies between exit polls and official vote
tallies. This analysis method was made public recently by NEDA in "Vote
Miscounts or Exit Poll Error? New Mathematical Function for Analyzing Exit
Poll Discrepancy" available at
http://electionarchive.org/ucvanalysis/us/exit-poll-analysis.pdf

Exit Polls were conducted in 49 of Ohio's 11,360 precincts. At least 40% of
Ohio's polled precincts show statistically significant differences between
Kerry's exit poll percent and official vote count percent. 35% of these
exit polls overestimated the Kerry official vote share. This is five times
the number expected. Three of the most glaring examples are:

1. In E/M precinct 27, with an estimated 100 respondents, Kerry's
official vote count was 29% less than his exit poll share, creating a 58%
difference between Kerry and Bush exit poll and official vote margins. There
is less than a one in 867,205,500 chance of this occurring due to chance.

2. In E/M precinct 25, with an estimated 62 respondents, Kerry's
official vote count was 28% less than his exit poll share, creating a 56%
difference between Kerry and Bush exit poll and official vote margins. There
is less than a one in 234,800 chance of this occurring due to chance.

3. In E/M precinct 48, with an estimated 100 respondents, Kerry's
official vote was 16% less than his exit poll share, creating a 32%
difference between Kerry and Bush exit poll and official vote margins.
There is less than a one in 17,800 chance of this occurring due to chance.

There are also two precincts where the Bush official vote count is
significantly less than the Bush exit poll share. The number of significant
discrepancies and the pattern of Ohio's discrepancy shown in the NEDA report
provide strong support for the conclusion that vote count errors converted a
Kerry win to a Bush win.

New electronic voting equipment without voter verified paper ballots,
implemented under the 2002 Help America Vote Act, makes it easier for a
small number of people to manipulate vote counts and nearly impossible to
independently audit vote count accuracy. Virtually every county in America
today publicly reports its vote counts in a way that hides evidence of
miscounts. This allows those with access (whether authorized or not) to
manipulate or make mistakes in vote counting with negligible possibility of
detection.

Without accurate elections, America is not a democracy. NEDA urges the
media to publicize the results of this report and its recommendations, in
order to return to the American people their right to determine the
country's leaders.

The National Election Data Archive is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
whose mission is to scientifically investigate the accuracy of elections
through the creation and analysis of a database containing precinct-level
vote-type election data for the entire United States. By making detailed
election data publicly available NEDA furthers its goal of providing the
means for independent analysts to evaluate the accuracy of vote counts in
time to ensure that properly elected candidates are sworn into office
following future elections.

For further information contact:
Kathy Dopp, MS Mathematics, NEDA, President kathy@uscountvotes.org
435-658-4657 or
Ron Baiman, PhD, Economics, NEDA, Vice President, ron@uscountvotes.org

National Election Data Archive (NEDA)
http://electionarchive.org
--------------------------------

To receive our email announcements, please email
election-subscribe@uscountvotes.org

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend