371 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Why is "Girly-Man" acceptable, and "Macaca" not?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   7 comments

Bill Wetzel
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bill Wetzel
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
"She maybe is Puerto Rican or the same thing as Cuban. I mean they are all very hot. They have, you know, part of the black blood in them and part of the Latino blood in them that, together, makes it." - Arnold Schwarzenegger


With those comments, Arnold has joined a growing list of Republican lawmakers who have recently made racially insensitive, if not downright racist comments. However, unlike George "Macaca" Allen and Conrad "Little Guatemalan Man" Burns, Schwarzenegger's comments have another disparaging tinge to them. One that is made even worse when you look at his own personal history.

You see, anybody can make a stupid comment. In fact, anybody can do a stupid thing or two. We all have. And, in today's media frenzied climate, a public figure is in constant danger of stepping on his tongue for almost any comment on any subject, however innocuous their intentions may be. It happens.

Although, the problem with Arnold is that he has one consistent running theme in his background. He has problems in dealing with women. His past is littered with unwelcome advances and misogynistic quotes. He has famously devalued women as a way of attacking men, because in his world associating femininity with masculinity (girly-men) is a horrible affliction.

Unfortunately, hardly anybody ever notices or cares about these issues.

Witness the reaction to his comments, which were made about a Republican female legislator, Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia, who has condoned them. They almost exclusively were related to the RACIAL aspects of his comments and not the sexual objectification of women.

This makes me wonder if the problem is not so much Arnold Schwarzenegger as it is the position of women in society as whole. Because guys like Arnold would not have gotten a free pass for so long if we were not a society of like-minded enthusiasts and woeful enablers.

For one thing, men are practically raised as chauvinists. It is not only okay, it is ideal for us to sexual objectify women. From before we are even at a sexual age, we are bombarded with advertisements, pornography and entertainment, all with sexual overtones. Of course, sex is not only thrown at us, it is also somewhat taboo. Sex is portrayed as both pleasurable and dirty, so, by proxy, women are shed in this light as well. It dehumanizes women, and downplays their emotions. Women become little more than sperm receptacles, although at some point in time they are needed to cook, clean and bear children.

They live their lives as servants, in some way, shape or form, for men.

Our language is also filled with female denigration. In music, on television, in film and in our daily lives. Observe how terms associated with women are utilized to disparage men. Remember the "Girly-men" comment referenced earlier? Well, that type of negative confluence is commonplace in our vernacular. How many times have you heard a man/boy denigrate another by calling them a "p*ssy" or a "b*tch?" How often is all of this considered a joke? Dismissed as one?

Too often.

As a Blackfeet Indian, I habitually study literature, history, film and pop culture from a certain perspective. Most accounts of American Indians, and other minorities, are viewed through a Eurocentric prism, meaning that the history and portrayals of people of skin color are recorded through the eyes of Europeans and European descendents. Women face a similar situation, in that their history and societal roles are perpetuated by a white male power structure. Furthermore, women are raised and educated within this hostile power structure. They have to see the gendering of discourse in all aspects of their lives.

Women live in a world where femininity is weak. Masculinity is strong. Where being sexist is laughed off as a joke. Where Senators can make stupid comments on race and get excoriated, but a known misogynist can make a sexist comment which is virtually invisible to the world.

Is the race aspect of what Schwarzenegger said important? Yes, it is. Partly because he is dumb enough to look at race from that point of view, the notion of racial characteristics, explicitly inherent in the "blood" of someone of skin color. But, it's more important to understand the sexuality of minority women. There is a white male fetish for the
"dirtiness" of a minority woman. They are dehumanized. Willing and unrapeable. Female promiscuity and skin color are conflated in the eyes of men. Hood rats. Ghetto booty. Border Banger. It all means minority women are lascivious, sexual creatures.

Amerigo Vespucci used to write about the New World, in order to encourage adventurous men to come and colonize this far off and foreign place. He portrayed indigenous women as uncontrollably lustful. Naked and animal-like. These women would defile and prostitute themselves at the opportunity to copulate with Christians. He specifically noted that while they were immodest and libidinous, they were still clean and beautiful. This is a typical male fantasy. The sexy, dirty, yet somehow clean and beautiful brown woman.

Do not think men are all that much different nowadays.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Bill Wetzel Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bill Wetzel is Amskapi Pikuni aka Blackfeet from Montana. His writing has appeared in the American Indian Culture & Research Journal, Yellow Medicine Review, Studies In Indian Literatures (SAIL), Hinchas de Poesia, Red Ink Magazine, Literary (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Something About Something: An Interview with Poet Shelly Taylor

Nostradamus says: "Obama will......"

National Short Story Month: Five Questions with Stephen Graham Jones

Palin Winks Her Way To Victory

National Short Story Month: Five Questions with Five Writers

America Has Spoken And It Said: "Hell No We Can't!!!"

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend