Article: Prophetic Exclusive: Are Private, Rogue, American and Brit Agents, Causing Terrorist Attacks In Iraq And Elsewhere?

Prophetic Exclusive: Are Private, Rogue, American and Brit Agents, Causing Terrorist Attacks In Iraq And Elsewhere?

Bombings, assassiantions, murders, massive "offenses," who is realy responsible for the massive mayhem in Iraq? Baghdad blast kills Several Sunni sheikhs, which had close contacts with US-led forces The Questions and Direction Of This Article Are Prophetic in Nature. It has been reported that witnesses spotted a Helicopter in the use of Private Security Contractors, flying near the al-Mansour high-rise hotel in Baghdad on June 25, 2007, which is the home of many, foreign diplomats and international news organizations, which was bombed today. It was unclear, which Private Security Contractor's used or owned that helicopter or where it took off from, nor how fast it was flying and in which direction, nor where it landed. This is far from the first time that non-Arabs have been either implicated, witnessed, or suspected in such horrors. Thus far, twelve people are known to be dead and 18 wounded, as allegedly a "suicide bomber wearing a vest packed with explosives" was detonated inside the al-Mansour Hotel. However, I ask, how do they know so quickly what caused the blast if it was so massive as to have destroyed as much as was reported in several news broadcasts? And if a living witness was close enough to see the "suicide bomber wearing a vest packed with explosives," who is this witness and how did this alleged "witness" survive the devastation which wrecked the 'reception area and left a lobby full of "charred remains" of people burned by the blast beyond recognition, if he was close enough to see a "suicide bomber wearing a vest packed with explosives?" If an alleged "witness" did identify a "suicide bomber wearing a vest packed with explosives," why wasn't the wearer identified and apprehended before the massive explosion, which according to witnesses outside the hotel, "Shook the hotel" and other nearby structures and destroyed everything in the lobby? If there was no witness, after such a massive explosion, how could there have been any evidence remaining that pointed to a "suicide bomber wearing a vest packed with explosives?" Some suspect a rat in the woodpile-and perhaps a helicopter flying rat at that? The tremendous explosion was said to have taken place during a gathering of local tribes. Several important Sunni tribal leaders were among 12 humans killed in the bombing in central Baghdad at the al-Mansour Hotel including, most prominently, Fassal al-Igoud, former Anbar governor. The police said that the number of prominent Sheiks could rise as charred bodies are identified. A number of foreigners also live in the hotel. The Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki claimed that the hotel attack was retaliation against Sunni Arab tribal leaders who were joining U.S. and Iraqi forces to fight al Qaeda because they were tired all their killing of Iraqis. The same al Qaeda, whose alleged leader is an old and dear friend of the Bushites, and who was a member of the Carlisle Group, which allegedly has profited $15 Billion dollars since the war began? Maliki said that, "The terrorists committed this crime to cover their defeats in Anbar and Diyala provinces at the hands of our military forces and the sons of the tribes." Some, people, however, might wonder if those who hold power over his life and/or income, solicited the opinions of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki? And if so, who might they be? The al-Mansour Hotel is well known to Americans and Brits as a place used by foreigners and Iraqi officials. This is, at least, the third report of Private Americans and Brits disguised as Arabs attempting to set off explosives in either quiet residential districts or in market places. Lieutenant Colonel Scott Bliechwhiel claimed that, "According to initial reports, six sheikhs are among the dead." According to police Anbar province Sunni leaders, who were meeting at the hotel, were the targets of the attack. Iraqi journalist, Rahim al-Maliki, working for al-Iraqiya TV, was also killed in the explosion. If this is true and the mission of these American "friendly Anbar province Sunni leaders, who were meeting at the hotel" was in the interest of the occupying forces, why didn't the American Military give them security and protection? Fifteen were injured in the Hotel bombing, including Sunni tribal leader Fasal al-Khoud a founder of the Anbar Salvation Council, which is used by Westerners and Iraqi officials. The bomb exploded in the lobby shaking the entire building. A twenty-eight year old hotel employee, Saif al-Rubaie, told the Associated Press news agency the casualties were mostly Iraqi employees who were busy in the reception area. LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION??? Is it true that some Americans and/or Brits, coveted the hotel because of it's location, sitting comfortably on the banks of the Tigris River, near the Green Zone, in Baghdad, and is often used by Iraqi officials visiting the City? Was this bombing a Coincidence? Or are the reports that Americans and Brits are behind many of the bombings in efforts to keep unrest and anger in order to provoke reprisals to facilitate requiring an American presence there until the oil agreement is signed and until Brits and Americans have completed assassinations of most honest Iraqi politicians, and business owners so that contractors can usurp and steal all profitable Iraqi businesses and other enterprises of the Iraqi's, including perhaps this hotel, which has a multiple target appeal? In two other bombings, at least 36 Iraqi's were killed in the southern city of Hilla and in Baiji, in the north, 15 police were killed and 70 other people were wounded, as someone allegedly crashed an oil tanker into the police headquarters there. In addition, more than eight were killed when a bomb exploded among a crowd of police recruits near the governor's office in Hilla, sixty miles south of Baghdad. One story is that in the last few months several tribes in Anbar have reputedly turned on the al-Qaeda and other radical Sunni insurgent groups. Unfortunately, many believe this to be untrue as Sunni's are not, and never have been on good terms with al Qaeda according to other reports. Some have said that this attack will provoke "a rift between them," and others maintain that there never was a tie between them and that such talk is purely coalition driven propaganda designed to drive and provoke more violence to intimidate the Iraqi Congress to sign the oil deal. The attacks come during a massive security drive by US and Iraqi forces in northern Baquba and Baghdad in which tens of thousands of U.S. and Iraqi troops are taking part. The large offensive is called, "Operation Phantom Thunder," and combined U.S. and Iraqi forces against al Qaeda. Too bad they didn't use some of those "tens of thousands of troops" of "Operation Phantom Thunder" to protect those who were allegedly working in the best interests of the Americans. Brigadier-General Mick Bednarek, commander of the offensive in Baquba, the capital of Diyala and an al Qaeda stronghold, claimed, "We have killed a heck of a lot of al Qaeda, probably less than 100 hard-core fighters." What exactly he meant by the last phrase is unclear and perhaps questionable. If these were not "Al-Qaeda hardcore fighters," what were they? Passers-by, innocent civilians, women, children, what? Soft-core non-fighters, what? The offensives are an attempt to buy time for Maliki's Shi'ite-led government to reach a political accommodation with disaffected minority Sunni Arabs. Or was this a part of an Insecurity drive by the CIA, or Cheney's White House Basement Iran Contra or Rumsfeld's Secret forces, to continue to provoke the Sunnis and Shiites as well as insurgents and al-Qaeda to make certain that sympathy for an American Military presence in Iraq is impressed upon the Congress until oil profits are secured officially in a Robber Baron contract for American and Brit contractors, as I predicted in 1980? American generals have already admitted that a large number of top al-Qaeda officers have escaped from the latest operations and that Iraqi forces are not "holding the ground that has been won." The latter part of this comment, is to many, also open to debate The bombings came even as tens of thousands of U.S. and Iraqi forces mounted major offensives, in Baghdad and other areas, which included the fiery Diyala province, to keep al Qaeda militants from seeking hideouts in the agricultural districts and small towns. My last question is what is driving these "Offensives?" Do politicians have access to voting records of those who oppose the new contract to steal all the Iraqi oil profits and anything else of value in the value before they junk it? If so, are they targeting massive strikes to hide assassinations of those who oppose the contracts? I predict that those among the Iraqi government officials who are now opposing the Oil Deal, (which essentially steals all the oil and related profits and turns them over to American and Brit companies), will soon be, if not bought off, victims of more "al-Qaeda" assassinations, "massive strikes," and/or bombings. However, it makes little difference if the murders are blamed on al-Qaeda, the CIA, The alleged "Cheney White House Basement" Iran Contra type organization supposedly financed by billions stolen from the Iraqi and America citizens, or Rumsfeld's alleged rogue American secret operations group, or "Private Security Contractors," with or without helicopters, they are all on the same side according many-the side which filters profits to some American and Brit oil companies and contractors. This is the worst affront to the Almighty, since Adolph Hitler's war, and the most massive robbery in world history and some fools on both sides of the aisle are equally to blame for it. What do they think is going to keep them from joining Hitler and his staff in the bowels of Hell? I predict further that many members of this congress who worked for the support of this war and some who, supported the continuance of this war, will encounter in an unwelcome visit, and it will not be a visitation to complement them on their lack of conscience or honor. The God they ignore is not ignoring them and very soon they will face a fate, similar of those who have also blasphemed,