125 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 49 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Congressman calls Bush's bluff re: "terrorist threat"

By Silvestre Reyes, Chairman, House Select Committee on Intelligence  Posted by Richard Clark (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments

Richard Clark
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Clark

Dear Mr.  President:

 

The Preamble to our Constitution states that one of our highest duties as public officials is to "provide for the common defence."  As an elected Member of Congress, a senior Member of the House Armed Services Committee, and Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, I work everyday to ensure that our defense and intelligence capabilities remain strong in the face of serious threats to our national security.

 

Because I care so deeply about protecting our country, I take strong offense to your suggestion in recent days that the country will be vulnerable to terrorist attack unless Congress immediately enacts legislation giving you broader powers to conduct warrantless surveillance of Americans' communications and provides legal immunity for telecommunications companies that participated in the Administration's warrantless surveillance program. 

Today, the National Security Agency (NSA) has authority to conduct surveillance in at least three different ways, all of which provide strong capability to monitor the communications of possible terrorists.

 

First, NSA can use its authority under Executive Order 12333 to conduct surveillance abroad of any known or suspected terrorist.  There is no requirement for a warrant.  There is no requirement for probable cause.  Most of NSA's collection occurs under this authority.

 

Second, NSA can use its authority under the Protect America Act, enacted last August, to conduct surveillance here in the U.S of any foreign target.  This authority does not "expire" on Saturday, as you have stated.  Under the PAA, orders authorizing surveillance may last for one year – until at least August 2008.  These orders may cover every terrorist group without limitation.  If a new member of the group is identified, or if a new phone number or email address is identified, the NSA may add it to the existing orders, and surveillance can begin immediately.  We will not "go dark." 

 

Third, in the remote possibility that a new terrorist organization emerges that we have never previously identified, the NSA could use existing authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to monitor those communications.  Since its establishment nearly 30 years ago, the FISA Court has approved nearly every application for a warrant from the Department of Justice.  In an emergency, NSA or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) may begin surveillance immediately, and a FISA Court order does not have to be obtained for three days.  The former head of FISA operations for the Department of Justice has testified publicly that emergency authorization may be granted in a matter of minutes.

 

As you know, the 1978 FISA law, which has been modernized and updated numerous times since 9/11, was instrumental in disrupting the terrorist plot in Germany last summer.  Those who say that FISA is outdated do not understand the strength of this important tool.

 

If our nation is left vulnerable in the coming months, it will not be because we don't have enough domestic spying powers.  It will be because your Administration has not done enough to defeat terrorist organizations – including al Qaeda -- that have gained strength since 9/11.  We do not have nearly enough linguists to translate the reams of information we currently collect.  We do not have enough intelligence officers who can penetrate the hardest targets, such as al Qaeda.  We have surged so many intelligence resources into Iraq that we have taken our eye off the ball in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  As a result, you have allowed al Qaeda to reconstitute itself on your watch. 

 

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Clark Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend