OpEdNews Op Eds

From Woody Smith regarding Obama: "Be afraid. Be very afraid."

By Woody Smith  Posted by Jane Stillwater (about the submitter)     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


- Advertisement -
My friend Glenda just sent me this commentary by Woody Smith, a frequent participant in one of her chat-rooms. It was so "nail on the head" that I thought I'd pass it along:

"Be afraid. Be very afraid."

Although I am slightly pleased by John Edwards' second-place finish ahead of Hillary Clinton in last night's Iowa primary, I am less pleased that Barack Obama won it so handily, mostly with the assistance of what have come to be called "first-time caucus goers."

My analysis of that phenomenon is not as rosy as some. It indicates something that is actually rather obvious, that Barack Obama has excited our excitable young folks who respond to his amorphous "message of hope" rather than delve more deeply into the nuts and bolts of his policy proposals (his ideas on Social Security are practically Republican, and his health care plan is very weak and far too conciliatory to the health insurance industry), and without considering what an Obama candidacy would really mean in the heat of the general election.

I know the argument that holds that Obama will bring new Democrats into our party. I merely don't think it will offset the effect it will have on the currently somnolent right, and on the residual bigotry, both ethnic and racial, that still resides in the hearts of many people who deny it. Generally speaking, in a general election, a black man has to show a preference rate in the polls, even the exit polls, of greater than 6% in order to win the actual vote count, because that many people are racists but are afraid to admit it to pollsters.

When I couple this with Mike Huckabee's trouncing of the rest of the Republicans' sorry field last night, I am filled with the same feeling that the background music in various suspense and horror films tends to impart -- one of impending doom.

Did you like what the Swift Boaters did to John Kerry in 2004? Well, neither did I, but we all have to recognize how effective it was in helping to engineer a second term for George W. Bush. But I will tell you right now, it will seem like a lovefest when compared to what this same bunch (and they were just a finger on the iron-fisted hand of the Republican slander machine) will do to a guy whose middle name is "Hussein" and whose primary school education was, in part, received in a "madrassa."

Add to this his admission of cocaine use. What do you suppose is the percentage among undecideds and independents who think his straightforwardness on this point outweighs their negative opinion of cokeheads? This is DESPITE so many of them having twice voted for one -- because they gave the benefit of the doubt to Bush's DENIALS.

It doesn't matter that he's a member of the mainstream United Church of Christ. It doesn't matter that schools in largely Arabic nations like Indonesia where he lived with his parents are ALL called "madrassas." It doesn't matter that Bush was a drunk and a cokehead and cocaine dealer in real life. Do you think that most of the Republican rank and file care about, or even KNOW about, these actual facts, which are not generally mentioned in the venues from which they receive their information exclusively? Republicans pander to ignorance, fear and bigotry, and they will be HIGHLY motivated to vote against Barack Obama to the point at which Huckabee, with his non-threatening, socially reasonable aw-shucks persona will TROUNCE us throughout the redlands and in some bluer areas as well, like Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Much now depends on New Hampshire. If it turns out similarly, we have to look to some places we aren't accustomed to depending on, like South Carolina, to prevent us from making what I fear will be an ENORMOUS mistake.

Please, people, think about who we are likely to be able to elect next November, and vote with your brain rather than your heart. Actually, though, in my opinion, John Edwards is MORE liberal than either Obama or Clinton, and is likelier to get America back on the right track more directly and effectively than either, even if we COULD elect them, which is doubtful.

But if the race is Obama v. Huckabee, we are cruisin' for a bruisin'. Mark my words.
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

My trip to North Korea: Pictures worth a thousand words?

200 Concubines: In India, it's hard not to think about sex!

Exponential happiness: McCain, Obama, Chekhov & my 93-year-old aunt

Our dual-citizenship Congress: Lotsa pork for Israelis, no pork for California?

Google Earth: Gaza has now gone dark too....

The world's youngest profession: The sociology of a child prostitute village in India


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

with Obama....even though Edwards did support the ... by Susan Nelsen on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 1:57:21 PM
Is it the fact that for once people are seeing wha... by marquerite burgess on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 7:13:09 PM
Please! There always the perfectionist twits who w... by Guajolotl on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 2:32:45 PM
And from what I see, everyone else in the field is... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 3:24:13 PM
"I know the argument that holds that Obama wi... by Digitboy on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 5:43:03 PM
That's why he wins against Republicans in matc... by Wethe Leaders on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 9:12:51 PM
I think it is great that Obama Won in the caucuses... by Paul Roden on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 7:06:17 PM
I agree that the system isn't fair so change t... by Andris on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 9:00:47 PM
Check out this Democracy Now  transcript ... by Laudyms on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 7:36:56 PM
Woody, everything you've written makes a certa... by L. RETZACK on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 7:50:52 PM
 bridge to get over it.Jane,  Some of th... by Andris on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 8:51:05 PM
What does the Navy have to do with Obama anyway?? ... by Debbie Scally on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 9:32:00 PM
What could Woody Smith mean by "... largely Arabi... by Anatta on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 11:57:58 PM
Anatta,Thanks for the good post, really gave me a ... by Eddy Schmid on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 7:53:59 AM
Interesting that someone from Australia would call... by Woody Smith on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 10:10:45 AM
Perhaps I did misspeak, writing "Arabic"... by Woody Smith on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 10:14:12 AM
Misspoke  is my misspelling a piece of levity... by Andris on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 5:44:56 PM
This is Woody Smith, writing under a pseudonym.&nb... by Woody Smith on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 10:05:50 AM
The right-wing filth try to get the Democratic can... by John Hanks on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 11:29:08 AM
And it's a pity this didn't go in instead ... by Andris on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 6:18:21 PM
I so agree with your article.  The media has ... by beccy on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 10:18:57 PM
It seems that we have been too long under a fascis... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 8:54:45 AM