Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., is a doctor of law and researcher-writer attorney. He lives in NY City. He holds a Ph.D. in law from the University of Cambridge in England; a French law degree from La Sorbonne in Paris; and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Michigan. Dr. Cordero has analyzed official statistics, reports, and statements of the Federal Judiciary and its judges, who are the models for their state counterparts. That analysis is set forth in his study Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing: Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting at Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf; cf. id. >ol:66. His study shows that in the last 225 years since the creation of the Federal Judiciary in 1789, only 8 of its judges -2,131 were in office on 30sep11- have been impeached and removed(id. >jur:21§a). They hold all their adjudicative, administrative, policy-making, and disciplinary meetings behind closed doors and never appear at a press conference(id. >Lsch:2§A). They dismiss 99.82% of complaints filed against their peers(jur:24§b). The resulting pervasive secrecy and unaccountability lead federal judges to do wrong risklessly in self-interest; and they have the means, motive, and opportunity to do so(jur:21§§1-3). Their wrongdoing(jur:5§3) is so coordinated(jur:88§a-c) among themselves[fn213] and between them and insiders[fn169], and so routine and widespread as to have become their and the Federal Judiciary’s institutionalized modus operandi(jur:49§4). Dr. Cordero is promoting presentations of the evidence of federal judges’ unaccountability and riskless wrongdoing. Such evidence can outrage the public(jur:83§§2-3) and encourage ever more journalists to further investigate it(jur:100§§3-4). Their findings can outrage the national public and cause it to demand official investigations of the Federal Judiciary and officials of the other branches conniving with its judges(id. >ol:55). Such demand is likely to be met during the coming long electoral season of mid-term, primary, and presidential election campaigns, when politicians must be responsive to public sentiment or be defeated at the polls. The official investigators will be able to make even more outrageous findings. A more outraged public will force reform that treats judges as accountable public servants. Dr. Cordero offers to make a presentation(Lsch:9) to you and your colleagues of judicial wrongdoing evidence and how to join his multidisciplinary academic and business venture.