91 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Our Objective US Press; Protecting American People from the Truth


OpEdNews admin
Message OpEdNews admin
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Our Objective US Press; Protecting American People from the Truth Dr. Gerry Lower

 

OpEdNews.Com

With the 20th century emergence of "political correctness," the free American press has struggled to attain "objectivity" in reporting the national news, a struggle ostensibly in the interest of fairness and honesty.  As a result, the press has done a remarkable job of keeping the American people from comprehending their current situation and their current relationships to the larger human world.

Objectivity ... "an object, phenomenon, or condition in the realm of sensible experience independent of individual thought" (Webster's Collegiate) is a virtually mindless journalistic approach toward a similarly mindless social objective.  Objectivity relative to what?  By what value-laden criteria do we interpret the "news," by the values of Democracy, the values of crony capitalism, or the values of traditional western religion?  

What we are after, of course, is a touch of honest human truth in American political reality, truth which is true for all observers and thinkers, truth independent of gender, cultural background or special interest.  But, there is NO truth "independent of individual thought," the individual being the only known source of ideas, true or otherwise.  No group of individuals, no human organization, has ever had the ghost of an idea.  Objectivity implies a truth independent of human existence and there is no such thing.  If there were, it would be relevant to nothing human.

The honest human truth, of course, is what Science ultimately provides, i.e., a pan-cultural knowledge base applicable to all people.  In other words, insofar as honest truth and human consensus are objectives, the path to that end is via Science and human knowledge, not via objectivity.

The American concept of "objectivity" is a presentation of the "facts" (just the facts) outside of any larger, definable historical or knowledgable context.  The absence of that context provides for intellectual mayhem, life in the here and now and the here and there, here today and there tomorrow.  That absence also provides a general "dumbness," an inability to agree on how the world currently works and a general inability to agree on how the world ought work, should Americans choose once again to be a Democracy.

What we are being told by current American culture is that objectivity is the path to honest truth and comprehension, "independent of individual thought."  Unfortunately, facts disseminated outside of a definable human context do not even constitute knowledge; and there is no path to human truth apart from human knowledge.

For the past half century, Americans have been living in a virtual sea of disjointed, unrelated facts provided ad libitum, without knowledgeable content only for lack of knowledgeable context.  Objectivity has been promoted in the name of "political correctness" and societal blindness to a greed-driven corporate America dedicated to "progress" (defined as the pursuit of profit and power) at the expense of any and all human value systems that might get in the way, i.e., family values, community values, national values.  This is, literally, the path to corruption and downfall.

As a result, corporate capitalism has made effort since World War II and the emergence of a "military-industrial" corporate aristocracy to realign itself with fundamentalist religion, the values of which have previously provided justification for imperial, colonial and capitalistic self-rightousness, pre-emptive conquest and dominion.

"News" in America has been driven into the black box of "objectivity" and is, on its own merit, not worth reading because it does not provide very much in the way of human knowledge.  News commentaries and analyses, on the other hand, properly rely upon and embrace the factual "news" and they also provide interpretation.

The American press remains effective at getting the "facts" recorded and disseminated but, due to its devoutly anti-philosophical nature, it has been largely a failure at presenting those facts within an honest human context and largely a failure at nourishing comprehension and concensus.  Such a press is no friend to the people.

The "war on terrorism" has been reported factually but interpreted in the absence of a larger historical context, a larger Democratic context and a larger knowledgeable context.  This is just another indication of how far America has been coerced away from its nascent values.

In a genuine Democracy, all "news" consists of empirical facts and inferences interpreted relative to the values of Democracy.  This is, in fact, part and parcel of preserving our chosen values.  This is, in fact, how simple this business of Democracy really is.  You see what you get and you get what you see.  If you do not like what you see and what you get, e.g., lies and unfairness, you get a new government.

We make life in America seem so extraordinarily complex that ordinary mortals are deemed beneath comprehension.  The cause of this complexity is blindness and ignorance and the absence of the larger frameworks which would allow a measure of comprehension.  From the bottom up, everything in Science can be made exceedingly complex.  >From the top down, everything in Science is elegantly simple.

Here is where natural philosophy comes to human aid.  No matter how complex the problem of infectious disease might have seemed at the turn of the century, the Germ Theory of Infectious Disease and its simple personal approaches to the prevention of these diseases was comprehensible by a guy who just fell off a bar stool.  If the people cannot comprehend a thing, it is not worth comprehending.  Bush World is absolutely incomprehensible.  It comes from the bottom up, it is complicated by religious conjecture, it is all over the damned place and it points nowhere but down.

Who cares about objectivity?  It is simple human truth that the people need most of all.  The American press has already produced more "objectivity" than is necessary to maintain a status quo that has failed all but failed the people.

We might all take Samuel Butler's insight to heart,
"I care about the truth not for truth's sake but for my own sake."

---------------------------------
Dr. Gerry Lower lives in Keystone, South Dakota.  His new book, "Jefferson's Eyes - Deist Views of Bush World," can be explored at www.jeffersonseyes.com and he can be reached at tisland@blackhills.com.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Author Unknown Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend