179 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Big Brother is Watching You: America's Real ID


OpEdNews admin
Message OpEdNews admin
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

Big Brother is Watching You: America's Real ID

By Don Monkerud

www.OpEdNews.com

Get ready for the new America.

Within three years, you will have to round up your personal ID, Social Security card, birth certificate, photo ID and a document verifying your home address, and present them to the DMV to obtain a new tamper-resistant driver's license, which will carry your machine-readable, encoded personal information.

After the DMV verifies your documents against a federal database, any new information - the Department of Homeland Security may add new information in the future - everything will be stored on federal databases. Failure to comply will result in cancellation of your driver's license and prevent you from boarding a plane or entering a federally protected building.

This is not a science fiction scenario, but the result of President Bush signing the Real ID Act on May 11. To avoid congressional debate, the GOP slipped the provision into an $82 billion military spending bill to pay for continuing the military occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. Said to be necessary because most of the 19 hijackers responsible for 9/11 had some form of identification, the bill supposedly will make us safer from a similar attack in the future.

Passing Federal bills without debate is a dangerous practice because the full ramifications can't be assessed by those passing the bills or by voters. Groups such as the National Governors Association, the Council of State Governments, and the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators object to unnecessary bureaucracy and retraining of staff and the National Council of State Legislatures estimates an administrative cost of $500 to $700 million. The ACLU raises issues relating to the use of personal information.

The law affects the status of immigrants and represents a major rewriting of immigration law. How, for example, will a DMV clerk verify the birth certificate of someone from a village in Mexico, China, Africa or India? Without a database that contains every suspected terrorist in the world, how will the government verify that other information is legitimate?

The law will lead to undocumented immigrants driving without licenses, training or information about the law, and will make it impossible for them to obtain automobile insurance. What will happen in Tennessee and Utah, and 11 other states that issue driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants?

Meanwhile, laws protecting our personal information remain very weak.
A national database with information that can be scanned like a barcode will give businesses a new revenue stream from data collection and sale to information brokers such as ChoicePoint and LexisNexis. Currently some businesses obtain personal information but the practice is not widespread; the Real ID Act will augment this practice.

Identity theft will become easier as a host of digital documents are input and stored by tens of thousands state employees, federal agents and police. Information will be encoded, but the system can be hacked or subverted. In 2004 a study discovered ten states with licenses-for-bribes schemes and one creative thief in North Las Vegas rammed his car through a DMV window and stole a computer with information on 8,738 drivers.

We are led to believe that national IDs will make us safer just as invading Iraq and searching grandmothers at airports have made us safer. In the past, Americans were distrustful of a centralized all-powerful state; that's what made us different from the USSR, but today a campaign of fear is leading us to embrace surveillance and a false sense of security.

The National ID law represents another tool for the government to track its citizens. With the misnamed Patriot Act, the government can legally monitor our mail, search our houses, check our reading habits, and make us disappear without a trace for only a "suspicion"
of terrorism. And terrorism is being more widely defined to include pro-environment activity. Not only is this a dangerous law, but in the future such information could easily be used to punish law-abiding dissenters and curtail legal political activity.

Copyright 2005

Don Monkerud Aptos, CA monkerud@cruzio.com
 

A

Rate It | View Ratings

Author Unknown Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend