Would you like to know how many people have visited this page? Or how reputable the author is? Simply
sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
I have 42 fans: Become a Fan. You'll get emails whenever I post articles on OpEd News
Dr. Dean Baker is a macroeconomist and Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. He previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He received his Ph.D in economics from the University of Michigan.
(1 comments) SHARE Thursday, March 31, 2016 The reign of the robots: economists getting it badly wrong
The story of the rising robots should mean that we are seeing a rapid increase in the amount of output per hour of work. The logic is that the robots are doing work that humans used to do, so we have more output for every hour of human labor. In fact, we are seeing the exact opposite. The rate of productivity growth, which measures output per hour of work, has slowed sharply in recent years.
(1 comments) SHARE Tuesday, March 29, 2016 Think Trump's 45 Percent Tariffs Are Bad? Try Obama's 10,000 Percent Tariffs
The Obama administration is pushing for stronger and longer patent and related protections in the TPP and other trade deals. Unfortunately most media outlets are perfectly happy with protectionism when the main beneficiaries are drug companies. It is only when someone proposes protectionist measures with the idea that they could help ordinary workers that they get upset.
SHARE Monday, March 21, 2016 NYT Promotes Study by Private Pension Company That Says Not to Trust Public Pensions
Economist Dean Baker shows why this is bunk and scare tactics.
The only thing he got wrong is that even Detroit was not broke either, as I showed in my article "Detroit is Not Broke!" a couple of years ago.
But the main point remains: corporate-bank funded studies are designed to make you distrust government & put your retirement savings in "trusty" big banks instead.
(1 comments) SHARE Monday, March 21, 2016 Is the "Gig Economy" Here to Stay?
The gig economy operates over the Internet and involves workers in a wider range of occupations, some relatively skilled. However, just as some day-labor companies hope to profit by evading regulations and cheating workers, many gig economy companies hope to legally skirt labor laws that apply to other employers.
SHARE Friday, March 18, 2016 How to Fight Poverty Through Full Employment
Although full employment is not the complete solution to poverty, reaching it would go a long way. It should also be an area of bipartisan agreement. After all, conservatives are supposed to like the idea of people working hard to lift themselves up. But they can only work hard if jobs are available, and they can only lift themselves up if their wages are just.
(5 comments) SHARE Tuesday, March 1, 2016 We Poisoned Kids in Flint to Keep Their Parents From Having Jobs
when we ask why the federal government could not ensure that the people of Flint, Michigan had safe drinking water, or address the enormous infrastructure needs around the country, the answer is that our politicians didn't want more people to have jobs. That's a great reason for poisoning kids.
SHARE Sunday, February 28, 2016 The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Team Pfizer
Obama and other proponents of the TPP speak of the stronger and longer patent and copyright rules in the deal as though these are provisions that offer benefits for the country as a whole. The reality is 180 degrees in the opposite direction. These protections offer benefits to the executives of these companies and to their shareholders, but they are likely to mean fewer jobs and lower income for the rest of the country.
(23 comments) SHARE Thursday, February 18, 2016 NYT Invents Left-Leaning Economists to Attack Bernie Sanders
Whatever standard of scrutiny the NYT chooses to apply to presidential candidates it should apply them equally. It is not good reporting to apply one standard to Senator Sanders, and even inventing credentials to press its points, and then apply lesser standards to the other candidates.
(1 comments) SHARE Tuesday, February 16, 2016 Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, and the Money
Suppose Bernie Sanders had spent four years in President Obama's cabinet during which time he did everything he could to try to break up the big banks and have corporate criminals put behind bars. Does anyone believe Goldman Sachs would pay him $250,000 to recount his experiences?
(4 comments) SHARE Thursday, February 4, 2016 New Yorker Shooting Blindly at Bernie Sanders
we are seeing endless shots at Sanders' plans for financial reform, healthcare reform and expanding Social Security. Many of these pieces raise perfectly reasonable questions, both about Sanders' goals and his route for achieving them. But there are also many pieces that just shoot blindly. The view of many in the media is that Sanders is a fringe candidate. The New Yorker is clearly in this attack mode.
(4 comments) SHARE Tuesday, February 2, 2016 If Bill Gates Turned to Philanthropy: Publicly Funded Clinical Drug Trials
There are serious questions about the industry's actual research spending. Much money goes to marketing, since the industry has enormous incentive to promote the sale of a drug selling for 300 times the cost of production. So, will any philanthropic types among the wealthy step for a free market and better health care system?
(1 comments) SHARE Tuesday, January 26, 2016 Mission Possible: Breaking Up the Big Banks and Universal Medicare
Senator Bernie Sanders is getting a lot of heat from political establishment types for proposals they view as outlandish. The top of the list is breaking up the big banks and universal Medicare. The complaint is that these proposals are so far off the political agenda, Sanders is wasting everyone's time by raising them.
(2 comments) SHARE Tuesday, January 19, 2016 Wall Street Rocks!
As economic theory tells us, the remedy for weak demand is more demand. The quickest way to get more demand is to have the government spend money on things like infrastructure, clean energy, education, health care and all sorts of other goodies. That would create jobs today and make the economy stronger in the future.
SHARE Wednesday, January 6, 2016 Making America safer for predatory capitalism
In today's economy, getting rich does not necessarily require better serving your customers. A series by the New York Times on arbitration clauses in contracts shows that one of the best ways to make money is to find ways to rip off your customers. The point of these arbitration clauses is to take away the right of consumers to bring class action lawsuits against improper practices.
(6 comments) SHARE Friday, January 1, 2016 Why Your Retirement Prospects are Bleaker Than Ever
It's increasingly obvious that there's a major hole in the retirement system, and that the government can help fill it. That's why President Obama asked the Treasury Department to set up a new low-cost, low-maintenance savings plan for workers -- called myRA for "my retirement account."
(13 comments) SHARE Tuesday, December 22, 2015 The Federal Reserve Board and the Presidential Candidates
If the presidential candidates have not incorporated the Fed's reactions into their economic plans, then they really don't know what they are talking about. They will have no hope of boosting growth if they have a Fed determined to prevent the economy from creating more jobs.
(8 comments) SHARE Monday, December 21, 2015 The Fed's premature rate hike
The prospect of higher interest rates in the United States and economic weakness elsewhere has caused the dollar to rise against most other currencies. This makes our goods and services less competitive in the world economy. The Fed should be much more concerned about the economy's continuing weakness than the prospect its strength will lead to spiraling inflation.
(5 comments) SHARE Sunday, December 13, 2015 Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Cracking Down on Wall Street
Sanders FTT would almost certainly do more to change behavior on Wall Street then everything that Clinton has proposed taken together by a rather large margin. It's sort of like evaluating the New England Patriots' Super Bowl prospects without discussing their quarterback.
SHARE Tuesday, December 8, 2015 Republicans attempt to weaken consumer financial protections
If the Republicans want to have a public debate on allowing the financial industry to pursue deceptive practices, they can do that with freestanding bills. When Obama vetoes the bills, they will have the ammunition they need to make this issue play a central role in the 2016 elections. Then the public will get to decide.