211 online
 
Most Popular Choices
April 10, 2011     


The Future of Nuclear Power


Submitted by Rob Finn
Tell A Friend
submit to reddit
submit to stumble upon

Tweet:
Uranium Conference Adds Discussion of Japan Accident: .ly/dJtUWX

"This will be the first public forum to review public safety issues in the nuclear energy industry since the incident in Japan," Fine said. "This is terribly important because of the potential loss of public confidence in nuclear energy."

Fine said that public polls showed that 60 percent of Americans opposed nuclear energy after the Three Mile Island incident. Public sentiment did not begin to change until 2005, he said.

"Do we want to see another generation of loss of public confidence in nuclear energy because of the accident in Japan?" he said. "That topic underlines this special session."


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this tweet has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments

Skinny Dog

Become a Fan
(Member since Jul 21, 2010), 3 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content
NUCLEAR POWER IS NOT THE PROBLEM:

The problem is with the reactors we've been using to produce it. If the reactors at Fukushima had been Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTRs) they wouldn't have had a disaster on their hands.

Liquid-fuel reactor technology was successfully developed at Oak Ridge National Labs in the 1960s. Although the test reactor worked flawlessly, the project was shelved, a victim of Cold War strategy. But LFTRs have been gathering a lot of attention lately, particularly since the events in Japan.

A LFTR is a completely different type of reactor. For one thing, it can't melt down. It's physically impossible. And since it's air-cooled, it doesn't have to be located near the shore. It can even be placed in an underground vault. A tsunami would roll right over it, like a truck over a manhole cover.

LFTRs consume fuel so efficiently that they can even use the spent fuel from other reactors, while producing a miniscule amount of waste themselves. In fact, the waste from a LFTR is virtually harmless in just 300 years. (No, that's not a typo.) Yucca Mountain is obsolete. So are Uranium reactors.

LFTR technology has been sitting on the shelf at Oak Ridge for over forty years. But now the manuals are dusted off, and a dedicated group of nuclear industry outsiders is ready to build another test reactor and give it a go.

Will it work? If it doesn't, we'll have one more reactor to retire. But if it does work and there is every reason to believe that it will the LFTR will launch a new American paradigm of clean, cheap, safe and abundant energy.

Let's build one and see.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:42:55 AM

  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 

 

Tell A Friend