Back   OpEd News
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Issue-2-Will-Hurt-Small-Fa-by-Kimberly-Hartke-091030-72.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

November 3, 2009

Issue 2 Will Hurt Small Farms in Ohio--Please Vote NO

By DC Publicist

Blogger Kimberly Hartke gives OHIO her "Unwellie Award" for putting Issue 2 on the ballot. This measure will heap bureaucracy and control over farmers, all in the name of animal care standards. The farms that will be hurt the most are the ones who know best how to treat animals humanely. George Orwell was Right!

::::::::

Reprinted from Hartkeisonline.com
Ohio Wins George Orwell Award from Green Blog
by Kimberly Hartke

There is something really rotten and stinky going on in Ohio. On the Ballot this coming Tuesday is Issue 2, which proposes to set up a permanent livestock board that will tell farmers how they must run their farms. Huge agribusiness groups, even soy producers from around the country are funding the political campaign that will subject farmers to the bureaucratic whims of this board. If the board says, you must confine your animals, you must use antibiotics in the feed, whatever, the farmers will have to comply or else.

Agribusiness Wants to Seize Power Under the Guise of "Animal Care Standards"

While consumers are led to believe this board will protect animals and insure their "quality of life." That is actually a ruse. This measure is not about animal husbandry. It is about control, and who has it.

This is a dangerous situation, since industrial farms will be in control of their competitors through this political power play. If there are farmers using inhumane practices or unacceptable conditions, why not correct them through the already existing membership organizations and peer pressure? These mega farms would certainly have the money to rectify the situation. No, instead, they want to keep doing what they are doing, and instead, control all their competition.

A "Local" Initiative Fueled by Huge, Vested Outside Interests

A political action committee called Ohioans for Livestock Care is paying for a big marketing push for this ballot initiative. While it sounds like a local campaign, many out of state groups are pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into this. Groups like Eli Lilly, a drug manufacturer, the National Pork Producers, Iowa Pork Producers Council, a Soybean Research and Promotion Council out of Minnesota, and the Iowa Soybean Association, are among the out of state organizations on the PAC contributors list.

Why would soybean producers care about animal welfare? Because they peddle an animal protein substitute. Any thing that hurts their competition, benefits them. If burdensome regulations drive meat prices go up, soy protein may gain greater acceptance with the consumer, thus market share. Why any livestock producers would team up with them is beyond me. Unless of course, their ultimate aim is also to edge out competition.

More Regulations Invariably Means Less Food Safety, Fewer Options

Big regulations always favor the big producers. They are the only ones who can afford to comply. Marketplace greed certainly makes for strange alliances.

If Issue 2 passes, we can expect traditional farmers to be told that raising cows on pasture is wasteful, unscientific, barbarian. I can imagine them getting called before this board and sanctioned for not raising their chickens in a "sanitary" environment.

In this panel discussion at a recent town hall, the Agribusiness gal claims that research shows there is no difference in quality of the food based on different methods of farming. If so, why is this board necessary?

Here is the video of the town hall, it is well worth watching it to the end, it is around 30 minutes:

I believe it is an attempt to ward off a push for this type of control from a vegan group such as PETA or the U.S. Humane Society. These farmers have decided to implement their own board as a pre-emptive strike.

Ohioans Don't Be Duped!

Ohio citizens, be forewarned. This measure will crush the local farmers, reduce the variety and diversity of food produced in your state, set up a costly bureaucracy in perpetuity.

If you want to make sure some farms won't be more "equal than others" as in George Orwell's Animal Farm, VOTE NO on Issue 2.

At the same time, if you are concerned about animal welfare, find out who the bad actors are (you might start with any Ohio farm that contributed to the PAC) and send letters to the companies and newspaper editors, picket their facilities, ask for the Ohio Health Department to implement regulations already on the books. The other thing you can do is buy directly from a local farm. Check with your local Weston A. Price chapter leader for a humane livestock producer nearest you and patronize him.

Vote with your food budget instead of voting for more government and less freedom for the individual farmer.

This Blogger Awards Ohio a Dubious Distinction

Hartke is Online! hereby gives the State of Ohio it's George Orwell Award for even putting such a measure on the ballot. The "Unwellie Award" is given to shine the light on bureaucratic nonsense and over reach. It is a dubious award which points out how unhealthy are society is becoming as we give over more and more control to Big Brother.

The best blog to follow who covers this issue is the Journal of Whole Health and Nutrition. See this post by blogger, David Michael on Why 12 Sustainable Farm Organizations are Against Issue 2

See today's related post, Jackie Stowers of Manna Storehouse Speaks Out on Issue 2.

This post is part of Fight Back Fridays blog carnival on Kitchen Renegade, click this link to learn what else you can do to support sustainable small farms.



Authors Website: http://hartkepr.com

Authors Bio:

Kimberly Hartke is the publicist for the Weston A. Price Foundation, a 501c3 nutrition education non-profit as well as numerous drug prevention nonprofits, including Parents Opposed to Pot (poppot.org)and MomsStrong.org.


Back