A "gross distortion of the facts," "utter nonsense," and "unprincipled" were a few of the other zingers the dyspeptic justice aimed at Justice Sotomayor's opinion. What strategic sense could lead a justice to administer such a public thrashing to a junior colleague? |
Read the rest of the story HERE:
At opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com
Sheila Samples is an Oklahoma writer and a former civilian US Army Public Information Officer. She is a Managing Editor for OpEd News, and a regular contributor for a variety of Internet sites.