The Real Threat from the Holt Bill as Written

(Election Science Institute, 08/22/2006)

1. How does one meet the specifications for auditing the "voter verified paper ballots" in 2008 when they have been granted a 'delay' in the mandate to have a voting system that provides the 'voter verified paper ballots'?
2. How does one conduct an "audit" using toilet paper rolls?
3. How long does it take to count toilet paper rolls?
4. Are 10% unreadable/spoiled toilet paper records (a la Cuyahoga County results) considered part of audit discrepancies that must be addressed? How does one address this for the purposes of an audit, which is designed to "verify" results?
5. How does one reconcile discrepancies using toilet paper rolls?
6. How does one complete the following reporting requirements after conducting an "audit" using toilet paper rolls?
   

1. 1. "The electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, in every fourth year succeeding every election of a President and Vice President."
      
   2. It shall be the duty of the executive of each State, as soon as practicable after the conclusion of the appointment of the electors in such State by the final ascertainment, under and in pursuance of the laws of such State providing for such ascertainment, to communicate by registered mail under the seal of the State to the Archivist of the United States a certificate of such ascertainment of the electors appointed, setting forth the names of such electors and the canvass or other ascertainment under the laws of such State of the number of votes given or cast for each person for whose appointment any and all votes have been given or cast; and it shall also thereupon be the duty of the executive of each State to deliver to the electors of such State, on or before the day on which they are required by section 7 of this title to meet, six duplicate-originals of the same certificate under the seal of the State;
   3. The electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.

1. Would we require a US Constitutional amendment now to change the date of our elections so that we can adhere to Holt auditing timelines?
   
2. Can a state certify results for presidential electors in the Constitutional time frame of roughly 4 weeks, even if it has not met Holt-EAC audit and reporting requirements?
3. What role, if any, does the EAC play with respect to "accepting" audit reports from the States or follow up if the States do not meet the audit reporting requirements?
4. Does the EAC need to 'sign off' on States meeting this requirement before States can certify election results?'
5. What are the consequences for States NOT filing a report with the EAC as required in Holt?
   
6. How will states meet Holt's requirements to "resolve (audit) discrepancies" to the EAC if the discrepancies result from unusable DRE paper "trails"?
   
7. Have we ever had a situation where any state has missed the constitutional deadline for certifying results in a presidential election?
   

1) In support of the principle of checks and balances, citizen oversight: REQUIRING BALLOTS TO BE OFFERED AND PROVIDED.—The appropriate election official at each polling place in an election for Federal office shall offer each individual who is eligible to cast a vote in the election at the polling place the opportunity to cast the vote using a pre-printed paper ballot which the individual may mark by hand and which is not produced by a direct recording electronic voting machine. If the individual accepts the offer to cast the vote using such a ballot, the official shall provide the individual with the ballot and the supplies necessary to mark the ballot, and shall ensure (to the greatest extent practicable) that the waiting period for the individual to cast a vote is not greater than the waiting period for an individual who does not agree to cast the vote using such a paper ballot under this paragraph. Jurisdictions will ensure that a sufficient supply of paper ballots be available, that notice of the option is provided, that the ballots are treated with equal dignity provided to other ballots, including canvassing/counting those ballots on election day, and that consequences are provided for violations. The choice of the voter as to the form of their ballot shall be prominently posted at the polling place in all areas where informational posters are placed and in any event shall be prominently posted at the point where the voter is required to choose ballot form. Pollworkers shall verbally inform voters of their choice as to each voter, and nothing shall be construed to prohibit citizens from providing the same or other additional information concerning choice of ballot and such informational activities shall not be considered electioneering, so long as they do not expressly refer to the choices on the ballot, but only to the voter's choice of a type of ballot. In the event of violations related to the provision, canvassing, and handling of paper ballots, any citizen eligible to vote in the jurisdiction will have standing to go to court to require compliance and authority for the court to grant immediate relief. Funding for training and documentation for election officials and election workers in the proper hand counting methods and election administration using paper ballots will be appropriated to support this provision. Prior to election certification, appropriate protocols must be implemented to ensure the integrity of election results as authenticated by transparent vote counting methods.

(Compliance to be determined by each state in a state plan process that supports the standards for democratic elections, those being citizen oversight and security, and which process includes diverse stakeholders group including citizen representation, published plans, and consequences for noncompliance. State Plans will be published in the Federal Register.)

Effective Date State Plan: February, 2008

Effective Date Implementation: General Election November 2008

2) In support of the principle of fiscal responsibility and stabilization of state governmental administration, checks and balances, citizen oversight: BUYOUT funding for states wishing to replace DRE systems with paper-based voting systems. (BUYOUT funding can be applied to paper ballot, optical scan voting systems, paper ballot, hand count systems, or a combination thereof. In the case of buyout funding as applied to hand count systems, training costs may be included.)

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).