SF: I am not aware of the documentaries. Accordingly, I am also not aware of their implications. I do not know of the extent of what Mr. al-Baluchi is aware, although he has never mentioned anything about the videos to which you refer nor has he mentioned the manner in which the buildings in New York collapsed. I will not be involved in his defense in New York, so I am not focused on the substance of the allegations against him.
TP: Well, can you watch this video and tell us what you think?
SF: Can I watch the video? Yes. Will I watch the video? No.
TP: Why not?
SF: Because I am not involved in the substance of the allegations against Mr. al-Baluchi and I am otherwise very, very busy.
TP: You said; "Mr. al-Baluchi is well-aware of the claim by some people that 9/11 was an inside job and he specifically addressed, and refuted, that claim". Yet if he is not aware of the allegations made by this video, and other 9/11 truth information, then what information is Mr. al-Baluchi "well aware" of? What claims pertaining to 9/11 being an inside job did he specifically address, and refute?
SF: He refuted the claim that the United States government was involved in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
TP: Okay, let's talk about the mental state of the detainees. In my opinion Zacarias Moussaoui was an angry, anti-American demagogue, and that is why the government put him on trial. According to Wikipedia; "prosecutors in Moussaoui's drawn-out trial had difficulty directly connecting him to the 19 participants". But that was hardly necessary given Mr. Moussaoui's courtroom demeanor.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
