68 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 45 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/23/09

Forget Iran, say NO to concealed vote counting in the US of A

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Message Nancy T
Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

As you decry the alleged election fraud in Iran, keep in mind that the majority of the nation's state election officials - like NH state election officials - have knowingly approved fraud-friendly and defective vote counting computers. Forget Iran; it's time to say "NO" to concealed vote counting here in America.

 


The New York Times has come out with yet another editorial in support of concealed vote counting in America, hyping it up as "trustworthy" computerized vote counting and encouraging Congress to pass yet another version of Congressman Rush Holt's (D-NJ) corporate-backed computerized voting bill.

My concise rebuttal to Mr. Holt's latest effort to reform our election systems right into complete corporate takeover can be read here.

The Holt Bill that the NYT is endorsing does nothing more than expand privatized, concealed, computerized vote counting in America's elections.

Computer operations are concealed from the human eye.

And concealed vote counting by computers is as un-American as having a bunch of henchmen collect your ballot boxes, duck into a back room, and emerge to announce the election results.

Oh, wait a minute, that's what they're saying happened in Iran, isn't it?

In fact, "surprising" election results from concealed vote counting abound about these days. And not just in Iran, of course. America's 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. The 2002 Senate elections. Even local elections, like a multimillion dollar transportation bill in Pima County Arizona that voters - against all historical precedent - endorsed.

And now, America's corporate media has the nation whipped into a frenzy decrying alleged election fraud in Iran. But here at home, after beating their chests ad nauseum about Iran, the corporate media continues its complicity in the theft of our own democracy.

The title of the NYT piece alone tells it all: "How to Trust Electronic Voting".

The simple fact is: you can NOT trust electronic voting. No paper receipts, paper ballots, recounts (where, as we saw in NH's 2008 primary recount, ballot chain of custody is a joke and recounts are likely conducted with compromised ballots to validate a fraudulent computerized count), no statistically improbable audits (as proposed by Mr. Holt), can reverse the untrustworthy and completely unverifiable results of a privatized, computerized, non-public, concealed vote count

America's corporate media has long obliged elements - such as the Congress and their financial backers - seeking to replace the nation's formerly public elections with privatized election facades.

In America today 90% of our elections are run by corporate-controlled computers using trade secret software -- developed in large part by convicted felons -- for a concealed vote count.

Even if this was legal (IT'S NOT), it certainly ain't democracy.

And here in NH, with all to be said about our paper ballots, keep in mind that anywhere from 85-90% of those paper ballots are never even counted by NH's election officials.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Nancy T Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NH recounts no check and balance for its privatized corporate-controlled elections

NH Secretary of State: "Citizen Election Observers Threaten Election Integrity"

Summary of the Stimulus bill - Don't look half bad to me

The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists & J. Abramoff transformed America's elections & the reform movement

Fitzwilliam, NH to Vote on Prohibiting Concealed Vote Counts

Secret vote counting and the lost art of democratic elections

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend