Hillary WILL be a war president. She has been a war woman her whole career. She voted for the Iraq war. She was a leading influencer in supporting the destruction of Libya. She will be a conflict encourager in the middle east. It's what neocons do.
"The means of defence agst. foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home."
James Madison
There is no doubt that if she were to become the first female president, Hillary wouldl, because of HER character, feel the need to prove herself with war. I don't believe that it is necessary for a woman to prove herself to be an equal to men by waging war, but I do believe that with Hillary's history, she would find a way to get the US into a war that costs the deaths of thousands of American members of the military, costing the US trillions of dollars.
I believe that Bernie Sanders will do everything he can to stand up to and refuse to be influenced by neocons, neoliberals and military leaders who advocate for violence and war. I believe he will think about ways the costs of war can be invested in diplomacy, in infrastructure and education. Hillary won't. She'll make a statement, prove herself and betray the people of America because the bankers will loan money for the wars, munitions companies like Boeing, Halliburton, the latest reincarnation of Blackwater, Lockheed Martin and other big companies will have their hooks into her.
Representative Tulsi Gabbard stated:
"As a veteran of two Middle East deployments, I know first hand the cost of war," said Ms. Gabbard, one of the first female combat veterans to serve in Congress. "I know how important it is that our commander-in-chief has the sound judgment required to know when to use America's military power and when not to use that power.
"As a vice chair of the D.N.C., I am required to stay neutral in democratic primaries, but I cannot remain neutral any longer," she added. "The stakes are just too high. That's why today I'm endorsing Senator Bernie Sanders to be our next president and commander in chief of the United States."
"We need a commander in chief who has foresight, who exercises good judgment, and who understands the need for a robust foreign policy which defends the safety and security of the American people, and who will not waste precious lives and money on interventionist wars of regime change,"
"We can elect a president who will lead us into more interventionist wars of regime change, or we can elect a president who will usher in a new era of peace and prosperity."
Maybe she'll encourage Israel to start something that she'll bring the US into to continue, forever, with Iran, Syria, Yemen, Turkey (after it's thrown out of NATO.) Who knows, as a chronic, pathological liar she's very creative. She could come up with a whole new collection of places to make war-- Venezuela (they have oil) Somalia, maybe one of the BRICs, since they're getting a bit uppity.
Not to worry about this Hillary problem. She'll never get there. Her negatives are so high and the people are so angry, the winner of the general election will be someone who stands up to the establishment. It could be Trump, It could be Bernie Sanders, but Hillary will never get to be the war President it would be her nature to become. If it is her against Trump, she will lose and the opportunity to take back the senate along with the loss of the White House, Supreme Court nominees, and the hopes for the middle class in America.
6
6
4
