134 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 31 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 2/17/09

Obama's War On Terror: Proceed With Caution

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   18 comments

John Bruhns

The Obama administration is facing military uncertainty regarding the war on terror. President Obama inherited a hefty load of problems that are arguably unsolvable. He may not be able to live up to his campaign promises of ending the war in Iraq and shifting military focus to Afghanistan.

During the campaign the ideas sounded wonderful in theory. I supported Mr. Obama and still do. However, he's got a lot of work to do.

Lets start with Iraq. The Iraqi people just had another democratic election. But was it successful? Don't form your opinion from me -- the eternal pessimist.

Look at the facts. The Washington Post reported that election fraud was committed in every Iraqi province. But not serious enough to change the final results. Kareem al-Tamimi, an official on Iraq's election commission stated:

"We have received complaints over violations in all 14 provinces, with varying degrees of seriousness, but most of them were not critical and did not change the final results. Some of the provinces had more than others."

Well then, I'll just take al-Tamimi's word for it. However, the Sunnis and the Shias probably wont. This is likely to cause more civil strife down the road. After all, the Sunnis and the Shias are not Democrats and Republicans.

Violence in Iraq is down. However the key word is "down" not over. U.S. FOBS still receive regular rocket attacks. Sunni suicide bombers are killing Shias on religious pilgrimages -- and vice versa. U.S. soldiers and Iraqi civilians are still dying. The current death count for U.S. troops is at 4,245. We'll probably never have an accurate number of Iraqi civilian deaths because the numbers are so substantial.

Our troops were supposed to move out of Iraqi cities by June 30 as established in the U.S./Iraqi status of forces agreement. However, General Odierno's assessment of Iraqi police and security forces is dismal. They're not ready to take over combat operations.

Secretary Gates (a straight shooter) has stated that the President's plan to withdraw all troops within 16 months is just one option on the table. It's not the end-all-be-all. President Obama is now considering a 23 month withdrawal of U.S. troops -- 7 months past his promised deadline. What happens if in 23 months the Iraqis are still not up to the task? Will there be another extension? That will leave President Obama between a rock and hard place.

In the meantime Afghanistan is calling. With Bin Laden at large and believed to be in Pakistan the mission has yet to be defined. The newest U.S. troops who've arrived in Afghanistan kicking off President Obama's 30,000 troop surge have already seen action. Unfortunately, not against those who attacked us on 9/11. Instead they're clashing with peasants.

Colonel David B. Haight, commander of the 3rd Brigade 10th Mountain Division reported from the field:

"Afghan officials don't believe it's hardcore al-Qaida operatives that you're never going to convert anyway. They believe that it's the guys who say, 'Hey you want $100 to shoot an RPG at a Humvee when it goes by,' and the guy says, 'Yeah I'll do that, because I've got to feed my family."

Well that's just great. Are we going to pump tens of thousands of U.S. troops into a country that is historically known to be unconquerable to fight impoverished Afghans who will kill for money?

Boris Gromov, The last Russian General to command troops in Afghanistan said:

Afghanistan taught us an invaluable lesson ... It has been and always will be impossible to solve political problems using force. One can increase the forces or not -- it won't lead to anything but a negative result.

While our troops come under fire in pursuit of members of Al-Qaida our allies in Pakistan have brokered a truce with the Taliban who've aided and harbored Bin Laden and Al-Qaida.

How do we fight those who actually attacked us on 9/11 when they're given sanctuary by an ally of the United States?

Mr. Obama is not in an envious position. But hey, he spent millions to get where he is --he's got to take the heat.  If you think I'm being critical of the President please hold your horses because I'm not ready to saddle up. I'm just highlighting the dilemma he's facing.

In Vietnam LBJ's war became Nixon's war. The President should proceed with a lot of caution. Those who ignore history are destined to repeat it.

Well Said 1   News 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

John Bruhns Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Bruhns is an Iraq war veteran. He writes on politics and Mideast conflict.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama's Edge Over McCain on Iraq

Israel: Attacks on Gaza will Likely Backfire

Obama's War On Terror: Proceed With Caution

Cindy is a fighter

IRAQ: SIX LONG YEARS OF DECEPTION

Can We Surge in Afghanistan?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend