Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 22, 2006 at 06:25:43

View Ratings | Rate It

State DNRs breeding birds for the ethically and recreationally challenged to shoot

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Martha Rosenberg (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Martha Rosenberg - Writer

At first it looked like a win for environmentalists.

In July, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) and Pheasants Forever (PF) acquired 313 new acres in central Illinois for bird habitat and outdoor recreation.

But read a little closer and you see the acreage and birds are actually for shooting recreation, to some an oxymoron.


And what's being preserved is the right of the 10% of the state who hunt to do so on public lands.

Funds for the public hunting preserve were also provided by the Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation, a Commonwealth Edison charity, and a state wildlife incentive grant.

"We all know the importance of habitat restoration for wildlife," said IDNR Acting Director Sam Flood. "If there are no grasses, there are no birds. With well-planned habitat restoration...we're making a great investment in wildlife and outdoor recreation enhancement."

"The property already has thriving wildlife habitat for pheasants and bobwhite quail and will require little maintenance before it is open for public use," added Connie Waggoner, Illinois Department of Natural Resources manager, division of reality and planning.

Of course with 497,439 acres of public hunting grounds, Illinois hunters don't need more land for "public use." What they need is more birds. 1

That's why for decades the dirty little secret of states like Illinois, Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania and New York is they've been breeding their own birds for fans of "controlled hunts" and to fill state coffers.

"The big birds look like real, honest-to-goodness wild pheasants," says D'arcy Egan of the Plain Dealer, "but they're not. They have little chance of surviving in the wild, and are simply expensive fodder for Ohio hunters." 2

John Husar, the late Chicago Tribune outdoor reporter, agreed. "If they're off in some dumb spot, like the middle of a cut milo strip, hopping around and wondering at the fuss, you can figure they arrived in a basket," he wrote after an IDNR Conservation Foundation Celebrity Quail Hunt. "Let's all hope our imaginations hold up." 3

Not surprisingly, the cost of breeding pellet ready birds is as unsustainable as the birds themselves.

In the 1990s, Illinois was spending up to $14.33 per bird and losing $400,000 a year. 4

Ohio spent up to $11 per bird and could only provide 15,000 pheasants for an estimated 400,000 licensed hunters wanting a sure shot. 2

Pennsylvania, producing 200,000 birds a year, no doubt spends less. But when it spent $101,630 on a leg band rebate program to find out the fate of the pen raised birds, it discovered 55 percent of the roosters and 52 percent of the hens eluded hunters. Tell that to the auditors. 2

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Martha Rosenberg is columnist and cartoonist based in Chicago I

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum